Understanding Statistical Significance: Explaining the 0.05 Level

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlo2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of statistical significance at the 0.05 level. A common misconception is that this level indicates a 5% probability that the null hypothesis is true; however, it actually refers to the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis, known as a Type I error. The probability of the null hypothesis being true can vary based on the knowledge of the individual assessing it. The conversation also touches on the nuances of probability in hypothesis testing, emphasizing that the significance level does not directly inform us about the truth of the null hypothesis itself. Clarification is sought on whether the post is related to homework, highlighting the importance of context in discussions about statistical concepts.
jlo2006
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Heres the problem:

When asked to explain the meaning of "statistically significant at the 0.05 level," a student says, "This means there is only probability 0.05 that the null hypothesis is true." Is this an essentially correct explanation of statistical significance? Explain.


Help please. Appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More specifically, it is the probability that you reject a true null hypothesis.

The difference in the statements is subtle.

The probability of the null hypothesis being true may be 20%, 50%, etc. -- but the probability of rejecting it is .05.
 
Well, you can't say anything about the probability of the null hypothesis being 20% or 50% right off the bat because probability is based on the amount of knowledge you have. For one person the probability of the null hypothesis being true might be 20% and for another person with more knowledge the probability of the same hypothesis being true might be 1.

But if the probability of a type I error is the probability that the null hypothesis is true and you reject it, then let A = the null hypothesis is true and let B = you reject the null hypothesis.
Then P(A n B) is the probability of a type I error, and P(A n B) = .05
But you know that P(B) = 1 since the test was significant. So P(A n B) = P(A) = .05 and the probability that the null hypothesis is true is .05.
 
Is this homework? If it is, it is not supposed to have been posted here. If it is not HW, why did you post it under HW help?
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top