Help on thevenizing a Scheering Bridge

  • Thread starter Thread starter degs2k4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Thevenin's theorem to analyze a Scheering Bridge circuit under specific conditions. The user seeks to find the magnitude and phase of the sinusoidal current flowing through a galvanometer with negligible internal resistance. The steps outlined include calculating the Thevenin voltage (Vth) and Thevenin impedance (Zth) to determine the current (ID). It is clarified that the phase of ID is not a fixed 90 degrees, as it varies with frequency and should be derived using the arctangent of the ratio of the imaginary to real parts of the impedance. The complexity of the calculations is acknowledged, emphasizing careful algebraic manipulation for accurate results.
degs2k4
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Help on "thevenizing" a Scheering Bridge

Homework Statement



Under the following conditions: C1=C, C2=0, Cx=2C, R2=R3=R, Rx=0, find the magnitude and phase of the sinusoidal current flowing through the galvanometer D (ID) whose internal resistance is neglibly small.

qqswvp.png


The Attempt at a Solution

We have an unbalanced condition. We can determine ID by means of the Thevenin equivalent circuit:

Steps:
1) get Vth:

VTH = VCB = VC - VB = VAC - VAB

(Z1= 1/jwC, Zx=1/jw2C, Z3=Z2=R)

2) Now let's calculate Zth, which will have a real part (resistor) and imaginary part (capacitor)

cum50.png


ZTH = (Z1 || Z2) + (Zx || Z3)

3) Finally let's form the Thevenin equivalent circuit:

2jescqg.png


ID = VTH / ZTH

ok, up to this point I think we have got the magnitude of ID. What about the phase ? Since a capacitor delays voltage 90 degrees, I believe that the phase of ID is 90, but I am not sure...

Would this work as a solution?

Thanks in advance...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Your method will work. The expressions involved are rather complicated and you will have to be very careful with your algebra to get the final result, which is surprisingly simple.

The phase is not 90 degrees; it depends on the frequency. You will have to derive an expression involving jw: Arctan(Imaginarypart/Realpart)
 


The Electrician said:
Your method will work. The expressions involved are rather complicated and you will have to be very careful with your algebra to get the final result, which is surprisingly simple.

The phase is not 90 degrees; it depends on the frequency. You will have to derive an expression involving jw: Arctan(Imaginarypart/Realpart)

Thanks for your comment! I also thought that the calculations were very complicated...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top