Help resolving this number series

  • Thread starter Thread starter luckyjack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
The number series presented is 5, 3, 8, 8, 11, 13, and the next number is questioned. A likely solution is 14, derived from interleaving two sequences: 5, 8, 11, 14 and 3, 8, 13. The complexity of the pattern raises concerns about the expectations placed on test-takers. The discussion highlights the frustration with such reasoning in standardized tests. Ultimately, the answer of 14 is accepted as a plausible solution.
luckyjack
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I took the MCATs and I can remember one question was about number series stating:
5,3,8,8,11,13, ?

Whats the next number? I never could figure it out! And the doubt is still in my mind!

Anyone knows the answer? thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Although many answers may turn out correct, one likely candidate is 14. It just sounds like something they might do, interleaving two sequences together, namely 5,8,11,14,... and 3,8,13,... Of course, I don't know why they expect people who haven't seen something like this to think of it.
 
Tedjn said:
Although many answers may turn out correct, one likely candidate is 14. It just sounds like something they might do, interleaving two sequences together, namely 5,8,11,14,... and 3,8,13,... Of course, I don't know why they expect people who haven't seen something like this to think of it.

Wow, never thought of that solution! damn bastards ! thanks for the answer matey!
=)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top