Help simplifying this using Stirlings' Formula?

eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2
Hey guys!

So I'm self studying Daniel Schroeder's Intro to Thermal Physics and we're to use Stirlings Approximation to simplify the following (assume that BOTH q and N are large, but we don't have a relationship between q and N):

<br /> \Omega \left( N,q\right) \approx \dfrac {\left( \dfrac {q+N} {q}\right) ^{q}\left( \dfrac {q+N} {N}\right) ^{N}} {\sqrt {2\pi q\left( q+N\right) / N}}<br />

The formula to find the multiplicity of an Einstein solid is:

<br /> \Omega \left( N,q\right) =\dfrac {\left( N-1+q\right) !} {q!\left( N-1\right) !}<br />

The hint in the text says to show that first:

<br /> \Omega \left( N,q\right) =\dfrac {N} {q+N}\dfrac {\left( q+N\right) !} {q!N!}<br />

With q and N being large, I thought I could immediately say that

<br /> \Omega \left( N,q\right) \approx \dfrac {\left( q+N\right) !} {q!N!}<br />

But I don't know where you get the

<br /> \dfrac {N} {q+N}<br />

I tried immediately applying Stirlings Approximation but got nothing like the hint or the answer we're looking for.

I'm a little lost on where to begin here. Any thoughts?

Thanks so much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
eprparadox said:
<br /> \Omega \left( N,q\right) =\dfrac {N} {q+N}\dfrac {\left( q+N\right) !} {q!N!}<br />

If you cancel the common factor of N in the numerator and N in the N! expression in the denominator, what do you get?
 
oh nice! got it.

Man, I'm dumb! Thanks so much.
 
  • Like
Likes perplexabot
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top