A Help to understand the derivation of the solution of this equation

needved
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Please, help here people.
Im reading this article Wave Optics in Gravitational Lensing (T. T. Nakamura, 1999) . In the article start work with
\begin{equation}

(\nabla ^2 +\omega)\tilde\phi = 4\omega^2U\tilde\phi

\end{equation}
where $$\tilde\phi = F(\vec r)\tilde\phi_{0}(r)$$. Using espherical coordinates and the physical condition $$\theta \ll 1$$ and using a two-dimensional vector $$\Theta = \theta(Cos \varphi , Sen \varphi)$$ they can put the last equation in therms of enhancement factor F
\begin{equation}

\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial r^2}+2i\omega\frac{\partial F}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r}\nabla_{\theta}^{2}F=4\omega^2 UF

\end{equation}

where $$\nabla_{\theta}^{2}$$ are the partials in polar and azimuthal coordinates.
A second physical condition, that they called **Eikonal Approximation** lead to considering the termn $$\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial r^2}\approx 0$$ and at the right side of the equation they do $$V=2\omega U$$
rearrengment the remaining equation
\begin{equation}

\left [ -\frac{1}{2\omega r^2}\nabla_{\theta}^{2}+V \right]F=i\frac{\partial}{\partial r}F

\end{equation}

this last equation is like the Schroedinger equation with the variable $$r$$ instead $$t$$ and $$\omega$$ instead $$\mu$$

\begin{equation}

\left [ -\frac{\hbar}{2\mu}\nabla^{2}+V \right]\Psi=i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi

\end{equation}
they says, the correspondent Lagrangian is
\begin{equation}

L(r,\Theta, \dot\Theta) =\omega\left[\frac{1}{2} r^2(\dot\Theta)^2 - 2 U\right]

\end{equation}
where $$\dot\Theta=\frac{d\Theta}{dr}$$ .At this point i have a clue (more or less) about what are they doing. The problem is from this point and on...The article says, from the path integral formulation of the Quantum mechanic, the solution to the equation \begin{equation}

F(\vec r_{0})=\int D \Theta (r) e^{\int_{0}^{r_{0}}L(r,\Theta, \dot\Theta)dr}

\end{equation}

eventually, working with this last expresion lead them to a solution given by\begin{equation}

F(\omega , y)=-i\omega e^{i\frac{\omega y^2}{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty} xJ_{0}(\omega xy) e^{i\omega[\frac{1}{2}x^2-\psi (x)]} dx

\end{equation}where $$J_{0}$$ is the bessel function of zeroeth order.
please, can help me to understand how work with the path integral so i can obtain the last equation. Any helpful hint will be very preciated and will be welcomed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't help you with the path integral but what happened to ##U##? It no longer appears in Equation (7)? Also there are classical techniques to solve equations like (1) which don't use (or aren't called) path integrals. WKB comes to mind. Look at optics texts like Born and Wolf.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top