Help understanding easy state problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter narfarnst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the state of polarization represented in bra-ket notation, specifically focusing on how to interpret and derive angles relative to the transmission axis from given expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the bra-ket notation and its relationship to the components of polarization vectors. Questions arise regarding the derivation of angles using arctan and the equivalence of bra-ket notation to Cartesian coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on the notation and its implications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the notation, but further exploration of its derivation and meaning is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the use of specific notation in the context of a homework assignment, questioning the necessity and advantages of bra-ket notation over simpler coordinate representations.

narfarnst
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
First off, I don't need a solution, I just need to make sens of the solution I already have.

Homework Statement


What state of polarization do the following represent (Give your answer in terms of an angle relative to the transmission axis).
(a). |t> + |a>
(b) |t> + 2|a>
(c) 2|t>-|a>
-------
My professor has given us the solutions:
(a). arctan(1) = 45 deg.
(b). arctan(2)~65 deg
(c). arctan(-1/2)~27 deg.

From this, I've reverse-engineered that to find the answer in general, for m|t>+n|a> you take arctan(n/m).

But... what the hell does this mean, and how is it derived?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
't' stands for transverse and 'a' for axial and all that means is that they are the basis vectors of the polarisation vector and their coefficients are the components. Similar to (x,y) and the angle between them is arctan (y/x)
 
Thanks.

But why use bra-ket notation? Couldn't you just as easially express them as (a, t). For example, (2, -1) or (1, 1).
 
yes they're equivalent, but the advantages of bra-ket notation are lost in this examble
 
Ahhh, well thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K