Help understanding proof involving Maxwell equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter U.Renko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding a proof involving Maxwell's equations, specifically the derivation of the wave equation from Maxwell-Ampere's law when the current density \(\vec{J}\) is zero. A key point of confusion is the step where the time derivative is taken outside the curl operator, which is justified because partial derivatives commute due to the continuity of the functions involved. The participants clarify that the equality \(\mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec{E}}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\left(\nabla\times\vec{E}\right)}{\partial t}\) holds true. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these mathematical properties to follow the proof correctly. Overall, the conversation aids in clarifying the application of mathematical methods in physics, particularly in the context of electromagnetic theory.
U.Renko
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
help understanding "proof" involving Maxwell equation

I'm currently taking a course on mathematical methods for physics.
(Like always I'm a bit confused about where exactly I should post these questions, should it go to the homework forum? )


anyway as I was reading the lecture notes I found this demonstration that if \vec{J} = 0 in Maxwell-Ampere's law satisfies the wave equation: \left( \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} - \nabla^2 \right)\vec B = \vec 0 :

There is one small step I'm not sure why/how he did it.

he took the curl of \nabla \times\vec B, that is, \nabla\times\left(\nabla\times\vec B \right) = \nabla\left(\nabla\cdot\vec B\right) - \nabla^2\vec B

then since \nabla\cdot\vec B = 0 and \nabla\times\vec B = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t} he says \nabla\times\left(\nabla\times\vec B \right) = \nabla\left(\mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right)

so far I understand everything, but now he says:
\mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\left(\nabla\times\vec E\right)}{\partial t} and it is this very last step that I'm not sure if it's allowed. And if is, why it is?

the rest of the demonstration follows easily, supposing this last step is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That step just says that time derivatives commute with the curl. You should try this out for yourself and see that it is so. (Basically it's true simply because partial derivatives commute and the basis vectors are not time-dependent.)

Just write out the curl of E, take the time derivative. Then write out the curl of the time derivative of E and they are identical.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
You missed one:
$$ \left( \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}-\nabla^2 \right)\vec B = 0\\
\implies \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\vec B =\nabla^2\vec B\\
\implies \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\vec B = \nabla(\nabla\cdot\vec B)-\nabla\times (\nabla\times \vec B)$$

Note:
$$\nabla\cdot\vec B = 0\\
\nabla\times \vec B = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\vec E\\
\nabla\times \vec E = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\vec B$$

https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=m...0j5j0j69i60.3357j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
By Cairault's theorem [see http://calculus.subwiki.org/wiki/Clairaut's_theorem_on_equality_of_mixed_partials] continuous partial derivatives commute.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top