Help With A Concept on Work: Should be Easy

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheechnchong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational potential energy (PE) of a 0.6 kg baseball dropped from a height of 6.1 m. When caught at 1.5 m above the ground, the PE relative to the ground must be calculated using the heights involved. The participants clarify that the ground is the zero level for potential energy, and the correct approach involves plugging the heights into the gravitational potential energy formula. There is confusion regarding the initial calculations, with some results deemed incorrect by other participants. Accurate understanding of potential energy concepts is emphasized for solving similar problems effectively.
cheechnchong
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
A 0.6 kg baseball is dropped out of a window that is 6.1 m above the ground. The ball is caught by a person whose hands are 1.5m above the ground.

Questions
What is the gravitational potential energy of the baseball, relative to the ground
--When it is caught? (Is this -27.05 J ?)
--when it is released? (Is this 0 J ?)

just need some clarification...i already solved most of the problem so that I am not struggling with! THANKS erryone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They say relative to the ground, so the PE gained by the ball is the work put into it to raise it from the ground to those two heights listed.
 
Last edited:
berkeman said:
The say relative to the ground, so the PE gained by the ball is the work put into it to raise it from the ground to those two heights listed.

I'm sorry...by your post I am totally lost! All i need to know is if I am right or wrong? because if I am right, then i know the conceptual approach to this kinda question...
 
cheechnchong said:
I'm sorry...by your post I am totally lost! All i need to know is if I am right or wrong? because if I am right, then i know the conceptual approach to this kinda question...

While dealing with potential energy, you have to define the 'zero level' of potential energy. In your problem it is said 'relative to the ground', so this makes the ground your 'zero level'. Now, what is the definition of gravitational potential energy? Just plug in the two heights into the definition. The results you got don't look correct to me, btw.

(The result you got for a) (only it's positive) is what is stated in the post above by berkeman - the work done by the force of gravity equals the change of potential energy, which is the difference in the potential energy between the position at the window and in the hands.)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top