Help with a pipe, water, continuity and Bernoullie

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a fluid dynamics problem using Bernoulli's equation and the continuity equation. The initial conditions include a water speed of 3.0 m/s and a gauge pressure of 5.0 x 10^4 at a higher point in the pipeline. The user calculates the speed at a lower point in the pipe, finding it to be 0.75 m/s due to the pipe's diameter being twice as large. After correctly applying the height difference in Bernoulli's equation, the user arrives at a gauge pressure of 162018.75, confirming it as the correct solution. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining height variables in fluid dynamics calculations.
TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Help with a pipe, water, continuity and Bernoullie

Homework Statement



At one point in a pipeline the water's speed is: 3.0 m/s,
the gauge pressure is: 5.0*10^4.

Find the gauge pressure at a second point in the line, 11m lower than the first, if the pipe diameter at the second point is twice that at the first.


Homework Equations



Bernoullies Equation: P1 + density*g*y1 + 0.5*density*v1^2 = P2 + density*g*y2 + 0.5*density*v2^2

Continuity Equation: A1V1 = A2V2

The Attempt at a Solution



I work out the speed of v2 using continuity, with area-1 being pi*r^2, Area-2 being pi*4r^2,
This makes the speed 3/4 m/s

I themn put all known variables into Bernoullies equation, which gives me a negative pressure! (-53581.25) this cannot be right?

Any Ideas/Suggestions

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TFM said:
I work out the speed of v2 using continuity, with area-1 being pi*r^2, Area-2 being pi*4r^2,
This makes the speed 3/4 m/s
Looks good.

I themn put all known variables into Bernoullies equation, which gives me a negative pressure! (-53581.25) this cannot be right?
No, it can't. What did you put for y1 & y2?
 
I first put y1 as 0, y2 as 11, then tried y1 as 1, y2 as 12

It should be y2 = -11, shouldn't it? -goves an answer of 162018.75
 
TFM said:
It should be y2 = -11, shouldn't it?
Yep.
 
162018 was the right answer:smile:

Thanks

TFM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top