Help with a potential energy question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential energy (PE) of a 2kg ball suspended from a ceiling. The initial calculation yielded -47.04 J, which was incorrect because it did not consider the reference point for zero potential energy. The correct approach defines the ball's height as 0m, resulting in 0 J of potential energy. This clarification highlights that potential energy is relative to the chosen reference point, which in this case is the ball's height. Ultimately, the ball has 0 J of potential energy when its height is considered as the reference point.
xregina12
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A 2kg ball is attached to a ceiling by a 3 m string. The height of the room is 5.4 meters. Acceleration due to gravity is: 9.8m/s^2. What is the gravitational potential energy relative to a point at the same elevation as the ball? Answer in units of J.
The way I set up the problem is:
y=-(5.4-3)=-2.4 meters
m=2kg
g=9.8m/s^2
PE=mgy=(2)(9.8)(-2.4)=-47.04 J.

however, i checked the answer in my book and it wasn't it. :(
anyone can help show me what I did or/understood wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is 0 potential energy defined to be? Normally, we say the ground (0m) is 0J in these type of problems. In that case the answer for the problem would be 47.04J, as you say. (The potential energy would be positive since it its 2.4 meters above the ground.)

The way they have the problem worded it seems they are asking for the potential energy of the ball if we say the ball's height is 0m (and the floor is at x=-2.4m). Is this what they are asking for?

Also, what is the answer they give? This may help figure out what they are asking for.
 
Yes, I set 0 potential energy at the balls height.
 
xregina12 said:
Yes, I set 0 potential energy at the balls height.

Then by definition the ball has 0J of potential energy. That is your answer.

i.e. The balls' position is y=0m

therefore, U=mgy=mg(0)=0
 
oh i see! Thanks.
 
Anytime. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top