Help with Chi-Squared Test: Probability Link to \chi^2 Value

  • Thread starter Thread starter leah3000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chi Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between the calculated chi-squared value and the corresponding probability value in a chi-squared test. The user calculated a chi-squared value of 0.28 with 3 degrees of freedom and sought clarification on how to interpret this in relation to the probability distribution table. It was explained that a chi-squared value of 0.28 indicates a probability greater than 0.95, suggesting no significant deviation from the expected ratios. The user acknowledged a misunderstanding in their approach, realizing they needed to apply the chi-squared value to the table rather than trying to derive the probability independently. This clarification helped the user better understand the chi-squared test process.
leah3000
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Chi- squared test--please help

Posted this on 12.04.10 but haven't gotten a response. Is my data unclear? Can someone explain how to link the probability to the \chi^2 value please.

1. Homework Statement

In a cross between two types of pea plants, one heterozygous for the round yellow seed condition, and the other, pure breeding with wrinkled green seeds, the following offsprings were recorded;

Round yellow peas-- 108
Round green peas-- 102
Wrinkled yellow peas--105
Wrinkled green peas-- 101


2. Homework Equations

\chi ^2 = \Sigma{O-E)^2 / E}

The ratio of a heterozygous cross with a homozygous recessive

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I calculated the value of \chi ^2 to be 0.28. The degrees of freedom= no. of categories-1 = 3.

I'm a little bit confused on how to relate the calculated value of \chi^2 to the probability value in the distribution table.

I took the probability value as > 0.1 and got 6.25 according to the data in the table. I'm now assuming that it isn't a significant deviation as the value of \chi ^2 is much smaller than this (0.28).

Can someone please explain this if I'm on the wrong track. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://faculty.southwest.tn.edu/jiwilliams/probab2.gif

using the above table, first thing you select the row for your degrees of freedom. in your case, it is 3.

now this row tells us, if your chi square value is less than 0.35, then the probability of this particular event occurring is greater than 0.95. If the chi square value is between 0.35 and 0.58, the probability of this event occurring is between 0.90 and 0.95. And so on.

your chi square value is 0.28. therefore, the probability of your event occurring is 0.95 or greater.

now i haven't checked if you have correctly calculated the chi square value. and also, the chi square test is used to test a particular hypothesis. you should have stated your hypothesis.
 
Kushal said:
http://faculty.southwest.tn.edu/jiwilliams/probab2.gif

using the above table, first thing you select the row for your degrees of freedom. in your case, it is 3.

now this row tells us, if your chi square value is less than 0.35, then the probability of this particular event occurring is greater than 0.95. If the chi square value is between 0.35 and 0.58, the probability of this event occurring is between 0.90 and 0.95. And so on.

your chi square value is 0.28. therefore, the probability of your event occurring is 0.95 or greater.

now i haven't checked if you have correctly calculated the chi square value. and also, the chi square test is used to test a particular hypothesis. you should have stated your hypothesis.


Thank you so much! This was very helpful. I realize now i was actually doing the opposite. I was trying to figure out the probability without actually applying the chi square value to the table. HUGE ERROR:redface: I'm trying to learn from a text. Thanks for clearing things up!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top