Help with Delta Function & Spherical Electrostatic Potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the charge density, ρ(r), from a given spherically symmetrical electrostatic potential, V(r). The user has derived an expression for the electrostatic field, E(r), but is uncertain about incorporating the Dirac Delta function to represent singularities in the charge density. A suggestion is made to integrate the electric field over a sphere to find the total charge, which can indicate the presence of a point charge if the limit does not approach zero. The relationship between a 1/r potential and a point charge is highlighted, emphasizing that this scenario necessitates a delta function representation. The conversation underscores the importance of foundational principles in electrostatics for resolving such issues.
upsidedown314
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm having trouble with the following problem:
The spherically symmetrical electrostatic potential of a particular object is given (in spherical coordinates) by:
V(\vec{r})=V(r)=c\frac{exp{(\frac{-2r}{a})}}{4\pi\varepsilon r} (1+\frac{r}{a})
I found the electrostatic field in spherical coords (I think it's right),
\vec{E}(\ver{r})=\frac{c}{4 \pi \varepsilon} (\frac{2}{a r} +\frac{1}{r^2} +\frac{2}{a^2}) exp(\frac{-2 r}{a})\hat{r}
Now I'm looking for the charge density \rho(\vec{r}) in spherical coords.
My problem is with representing the singularities with the Dirac Delta function.
I'm not sure how to do this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compute \rho first and then we shall see whether a delta-Dirac is necessary.

Daniel.
 
I got
\rho=\frac{-c}{r \pi a^2} (r-a+1) exp(\frac{-2 r}{a})
Will this need a Delta Function?
 
This looks like a hydrogen atom type charge density?
An easy way to find a delta function is to guess at where it is, integrate the E field over a sphere of radius r around it.. that will tell you the total charge inside the sphere as a function of r.. then take the limit as r goes to zero.. if that doesn't go zero, then you must have a point charge at the center of the sphere.
 
Go back to basics. A 1/r potential, being generated by a point charge of unit magnitude, is a green's function, and its source is represented by a delta function -- in this case delta(r). As r->0 your potential goes like 1/r, so there's a delta function. for practical purposes, del squared(1/r) = - delta(r) -- there could be a few 2pi s I've missed). With the chain rule, that's all you need. (Also see Jackson, or any E&M or Boundary Values or Potential Theory or...)

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Back
Top