Help with Eratosthenes' Astronomical Measurement!

  • Thread starter Thread starter monkeymocha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem related to Eratosthenes' method of measuring the Earth's circumference using the angles of the Sun between Alexandria and Syene. The user seeks assistance in calculating the difference in the angle of the Sun, given a distance of 860 km between the two cities. They express confusion about the problem's requirements and request guidance on how to approach it, including the suggestion to draw a diagram to visualize the scenario. The answer choices provided range from very small angles to a more significant degree. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometry involved in the problem.
monkeymocha
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Astronomy Help! :(

I'm sure that compared to all the other problems posted here, this Astronomy problem is incredibly easy, but I'm TERRIBLE at sciences and mathematics and really need some help.

The problem is: "Although the distance to the Sun is obviously much larger than the distance between Alexandria and Syene, it is not infinite. This results in a small error in Eratosthenes' measurement, which is given by the difference in the angle of the Sun between Alexandria and Syene. What is the difference in the angle in degrees? (assume a distance between Alexandria and Syene of 860 km. It may help to draw a diagram.)"

The answer choices are:
a) 3.29 x 10^-4 degrees
b) 2.07 x 10^-3 degrees
c) 5.75 x 10^-6 degrees
d) 0.329 degrees
e) 3.29 x 10-2 degrees


This problem is referring to how Eratosthenes measured the circumference of the Earth by using the distance from Alexandria and Syene and the angles of the sun. See http://www.eg.bucknell.edu/physics/astronomy/astr101/specials/eratosthenes.html for details.

I honestly have no idea where to even begin. I'm not even sure what the problem is even asking. If anyone could just point me on the right track, I would really be happy! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Draw the diagram (Sun and both cities). There is a triangle that contains angle in question.

--
methods
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top