Help with Forensics: Physics Experiment with Blood Splatters

  • Thread starter Thread starter man_united_number_1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The physics experiment on blood splatters shows a clear increase in the number of splatters with more drops, suggesting that increased volume at the base pushes aside more 'blood' for subsequent drops. The surface type affects the visibility of splatter patterns, with hard surfaces potentially displaying elongated stains due to rapid movement. The discussion also touches on the formation of crown-like structures in liquids, which may relate to wave collisions and vibrations from the drops. The experiment involved dropping liquid from a height of 1 meter onto a hard surface, and high-speed photography is anticipated to provide further insights. The findings highlight the complexity of analyzing blood splatter patterns in forensic science.
man_united_number_1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Im am currently doing a physics experiment involving blood splatters.

Results

No. of drops No. of splatters
2 114
3 237
4 337

The drops were dropped in succession and I was hoping someone could help me describe what was going on. In note form that's what I think happens. (diameter of drop on the ground surface was within 1 or 2 mm of each other)

No of splatters increased as more drops were dropped, more volume at base causing more ‘blood’ to be pushed aside for the incoming blood?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I must preface this with the warning that I'm quite inebriated at the moment, so I might be missing something. As far as I can see, since the surface wasn't specified, it's indeterminable. The distance between the blood drops can be a function of either how much the victim was bleeding, or how fast he/she was moving. Rapid movement would mean more distance between drops, but it should also result in 'teardrop shaped' elongated stains. That might not be evident on a carpet, but should be on a hard surface or grass. In the case of a carpet, though, you might be able to determine how fast someone was movng by gauging the footprint depths and spacing versus the known weight and leg length of that person. That's about all that I can offer for now. I'll check back tomorrow.
 
Have you ever seen the famous high speed photograph of a crown like structure formed by a drop of milk falling into a container of milk? The crown has various little protrusions of milk forming upwards with little drops forming at their ends. The protrusions form a circular (crown like structure) around the point where the drop came onto the surface. The protrusions form arches outwards (maybe parabolas?). I have no solid backing for how these structures form, but if I had to guess I would think it is a result of collisions of waves formed in the liquid by the falling drop, or vibrations (which are essentially the same phenomena). As the amount of liquid increases the pool can support more vibrations, causing more protrusions to form.
 
The drops were dropped from a dropper onto a hard surface (desk bench in the lab) vertically from height 1m.

If that helps anyone. My mate is bringing his high speed camera round in the next couple of days so hopefully that can shed some light.

Thanks for your help.
 
Found high speed photographs of this process at :

http://ns.ph.sci.toho-u.ac.jp/gakka/history/topics/milkcrown.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top