Help with Half-Life and a First-Order Process

  • Thread starter Thread starter rneely01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Half-life Process
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the remaining concentration of radioactive radon-222 after 30 days, given its half-life of 3.8 days. The rate constant (k) is determined to be 0.18 d-1, and the initial concentration is 4.0 x 10^13 atoms/L. There are discrepancies noted in the calculations, particularly regarding the natural logarithm values and the final concentration, which is debated to be 1.7 x 10^11 atoms/L instead of the book's answer. The relevant equations for first-order kinetics and half-life are presented to support the calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate logarithmic calculations in determining the final concentration of radon-222.
rneely01
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



½ Life and a First-Order Process

ln [R]t = -(0.18 d-1 ) (30.d)= -5.5
4.0 x 10 13atom/L

[R]t
4.0 x 10 13atom/L = e -5.5 = 0.0042

[R]t = 1.7 x 10 11 atom/L


Homework Equations



Arrhenhius Equation
k = Ae –Ea
RT


The Attempt at a Solution



=> -(0.18 d-1 ) (30.d)= -5.5 (should really be 5.4 not book answer of 5.5)
=> ln of 5.5 is 1.70 not .0042
=> no idea how book came up with 1.7 x 10 11 atom/L, since .0042/4.0 x 10 13atom/L is 1.05 x 10 -16 atom/L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the original problem?
 
Problem: Radioactive radon-222 gas ( 222 Rn) from natural sources can seep into the basement of a home. The half-life of 222 Rn is 3.8 days. If a basement has 4.0 x 10 13
atoms of 222 Rn per liter of air, and the radon gas is trapped in the basement, how many atoms of 222 Rn will remain after one month (30 days)?

Solution: Rate constant (k) is
K = 0.693 = 0.693 = 0.18 d-1
t ½ 3.8 d

This equation is relevant: ln [R]t = -kT
[R] 0
 
Equations:

\ln{\frac{A_0}{A_t}=kt

t_{\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{\ln 2}{k}

So our givens are ...

A_0=4\times10^{13}L^{-1}

t_{\frac{1}{2}}=3.8d

What we want is ...

A_t when t=30d

From our half-life equation, we can figure out what our constant k is. From our first-order equation, solve for our final concentration and plug in the value k that is found.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top