Help with intuition concering braket sandwich

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hymne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition
Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hi there!
I have a hard time getting any sense out of what the sandwich:

<q'', t'' | Q(t1) | q', t'>
where t' < t1 < t'', actually means..

If we skip Q(t1) we get the usual transition amplitude. But how should i interpret this when we use an operator that is timedependet but act on a statevector in the "wrong time"?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IMO, it doesn't have a nice interpretation. In the Schrodinger picture, you are starting in a position eigenstate at time t', evolving for a time t1-t', acting with the position operator, the evolving for a time t''-t1, then taking the inner product with another position eigenstate. But "acting with the position operator" does not have a nice physical interpretation; in particular, it's not the same as measuring the position.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top