Help with Jupiter and Saturn please

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielandpenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jupiter Saturn
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on observing Saturn and Jupiter with a Bushnell Mak Cassegrain 100mm telescope. Users note that Saturn's rings are difficult to see clearly due to their nearly edge-on position, suggesting the use of smaller eyepieces like 6mm or 4mm for better definition. Observers mention that Jupiter appears smaller than Saturn, which may be due to its current unfavorable position in the sky, affecting visibility and detail, including the Great Red Spot. It's emphasized that comparing the sizes of celestial objects requires them to be viewed simultaneously in the same field of view. Overall, the conversation highlights challenges in planetary observation and the importance of timing and equipment choice.
danielandpenn
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi. Thanks for your help. I have a Bushnell Mak Cassegrain 100mm telescope. I can focus Saturn in pretty clearly, except that I can't find the right eyepiece that would allow me to view the rings to any degree. I can see a moon around it. Also, when I focus in on Jupiter, it looks smaller than Saturn but we're closer to Jupiter and it's bigger. I can't see the red spot either. I can, however, see four moons. At least I think that's what they are. Should I be able to see more definition in the rings on Saturn and the red spot on Jupiter? I have the following eyepieces: Celestron plossl 2X barlow, 32mm, 15mm, 9mm, 6mm, 4mm; and the eyepieces that came with the telescope: 25mm and 4mm. Thanks again for any help anyone can offer. I am new to this.

penny
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Saturn's rings right now are nearly edge-on and with a 100mm aperature scope, need one of the smaller eyepieces, a 6mm or 4mm o see them and then only just barely.


If Jupiter looks smaller than Saturn, then either you aren't looking at Jupiter or you aren't looking at Saturn (or both). Right now, Saturn is rising in the east at sunset. It is not very bright - about like an average looking star to the naked eye. Jupiter just barely clears the eastern horizon in the morning before sunrise. Perhaps one of the planets you are looking at is Venus, which is dropping fast in the western sky at sunset.
 
danielandpenn said:
Hi..., when I focus in on Jupiter, it looks smaller than Saturn but we're closer to Jupiter and it's bigger. I can't see the red spot either. I... Should I be able to see more definition in ... the red spot on Jupiter?

penny

Hi, Penny.

Previous poster addressed Saturn...I will address Jupiter.

Jupiter varies in distance from the Earth from about 4.2 AU to 6.2 AU; right now, if I'm not mistaken, it is in a very unfavorable postion at almost the max distance, ...therefore the disk diameter will shrink accordingly (reduced by about 32% from optimal)...and the surface features will become correspondingly more indistinguishable.

Normally at opposition (you'll have to wait about 6 months) the two equatorial belts will be discernible with a 'four incher'...and possibly a glimpse at the red spot if optics are high quality (and atmosphere crisp) and if it is facing the Earth (Jupiter rotation period is ~10 hours). The Equitorial 'bulge' will be evident.

Furthermore; even if you ARE looking at Jupiter you are probably not going to be able to compare relative angular "sizes" unless BOTH objects are in the same field of view at the same time.
Trying to compare object diameters visually from different FOW's is illusionary, especially since each eyepiece carries a different apparent angular field of view which makes objects "appear" larger or smaller wrt to it.

BTW; for comparison here is a site to get an image of Jupiter as it would appear on any date.
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/diskmap.php

On Mar. 24, 2009, at 00:45 hrs. UT, for ex., Jupiter's angular diameter was 34.4 arc sec. and the red spot is visible.

Creator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks so much for your reply. I appreciate it. Unfortunately, it is the 28th I'm checking this out...goodbye, red spot (haha). Is is still visible? It's sleeting here right now so I can't see anything tonight. Thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top