Help with Newtonian Potentials for Helmholtz Decomposition

Savant13
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to find a divergenceless vector field based on its curl, and discovered that I could use a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_decomposition" , and the article I found on this didn't make much sense to me.

First, can someone confirm that the dimension referred to in the Newtonian potential article is the number of spatial dimensions in which the field exists? If not, what is it?

Next, the exponent on what appears to be the absolute value of x for more than two dimensions can only be negative, which doesn't make sense to me in the context of the problem I am working on. Also, is that an absolute value, or some other notation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, d is the number of spatial dimensions. If d= 3 then the "Newtonian potential" is (-1/(3(2-3)(4pi/3))|x|-1= 1/(4pi|x|). Why would that "not make sense"? What problem are you working on?
 
See the thread in the classical physics forum. I started this one because no one was responding to the other one.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top