Help With Proving Peskin and Schroeder Eq. 2.33

  • Thread starter Thread starter Norman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving Peskin and Schroeder equation 2.33, specifically the expression for momentum in terms of field operators. The user has transformed the fields into momentum space and performed integrals that lead to a delta function, but is struggling with the cancellation of operators to arrive at the desired result of 2a^{\dagger}_p a_p. They seek assistance or hints to resolve the issue. Additionally, there was a mention of LaTeX functionality being broken, which has since been resolved. The user is looking for guidance to complete their proof.
Norman
Messages
895
Reaction score
4
I am unsure if this is the proper forum for this, since it is not actually homework... but here goes anyway.

I am trying to Prove Peskin and Schroeder equation 2.33


P=-\int d^3 x \pi (x) \nabla \phi (x) = \int \frac{d^3 x}{(2 \pi)^3} p a^{\dagger}_p a_p

so far what I have done:
written the fields as the momentum space quantities, done the integral over the spatial coordinates to give me the delta function and integrated over the p' variables to give me this:

The last step forces p'=-p

\int \frac{d^3}{(2 \pi)^3} \frac{p}{2} (a^{\dagger}_{-p} a_{-p} + a^{\dagger}_{-p} a^{\dagger}_p - a_p a_{-p} - a_p a^{\dagger}_p )

I don't see how these operators cancel out to give :
() = 2a^{\dagger}_p a_p

Any help would be greatly appreciated... even just a hint would be very helpfull.
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why isn't the latex coming up?
 
LaTeX seems to be broken - hope they get it fixed soon!
 
Now that LaTeX works...

Anyone able to lend a hand?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top