Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Help with Rolle's theorem

  1. Sep 22, 2010 #1
    Given is a one-parameter family of planes, through

    [tex]x \cdot n(u) + p(u) = 0[/tex]

    with normal vector n and base point p, both depending on the parameter u.

    Two planes with parameters [tex]u_1[/tex] and [tex]u_2[/tex], with [tex]u_1 < u_2[/tex], intersect in a line (planes are assumed to be non-parallel). This line also lies in the plane

    [tex]x \cdot (n(u_1) - n(u_2)) + p(u_1) - p(u_2) = 0[/tex]

    Now, the book I am reading claims that, "by Rolle's theorem, we get:"

    [tex]x_1 n_1'(v_1) + x_2 n_2'(v_2) + x_3 n_3'(v_3) + p'(v_4) = 0[/tex] with [tex]u_1 \leq v_i \leq u_2[/tex].

    However, I don't see how the theorem applies here... for starters, I don't see anything of the form [tex]f(a) = f(b)[/tex], as required by the theorem.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 24, 2010 #2

    LCKurtz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I'm trying to understand your notation. If n and p are vectors, I supose x is a vector dotted into n, which gives a scalar?? How do you add a scalar to a vector? Is the 0 on the right side a scalar or vector? And you say you have a one parameter family of planes through

    [tex]x \cdot n(u) + p(u) = 0[/tex]

    What do you mean by that?
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2010
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook