Help with shared constraints (game theory)

ruzbayhhi
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I've been struggling with shared constraints problems for a while now. I have a game between two players with a shared constraint. For example, player 1 is trying to maximize f(x,y) by choosing x, and player 2 is trying to maximize g(x,y) by choosing y. The players are competing in a non-cooperative game.
There is a shared constraint such that x+y<= a.

If I understand the source below correctly (p. 18 onward), what I should do is form a Lagrangian: L1 = f(x,y)+λ(a-x-y) and L2=g(x,y)+λ(a-x-y)? (i.e., λ for player 1 is the same as for player 2) and then solve the FOC? Is this the right way to approach this?

Reference: http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~facchinei/didattica/giochi/Lettura_3.pdf
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is one way to approach it since both share this constraint. There might be other approaches if ##f,g## are known, i.e. have a certain form as linearity.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top