How to Determine Significant Figures in Multiplication/Division?

  • Thread starter Thread starter parabolic1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant digits
AI Thread Summary
In multiplication and division, the result should reflect the lowest number of significant figures from the operands. In the example of 0.00420 x 60, the number 0.00420 has three significant figures, while 60 typically has one significant figure unless specified as an exact number. If 60 is treated as a conversion factor, it has infinite significant figures; otherwise, it limits the result to one significant figure. Therefore, the answer could be either 0.252 or 0.3, depending on the context of the number 60. Clarifying whether 60 is an exact value or part of the data is essential for determining the correct significant figures.
parabolic1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
just a quick question... (not a HW question)

i know that when you do multiplication/division between numbers you take the lowest amount of sig figs of the two and apply it to your answer... HOWEVER:

what would be the answer for a question such as:

0.00420 x 60 = ?

the first part has 3 sig figs, while the second part has 1... although I've heard you don't count whole integers, so would the answer be

0.252 or 0.3 ?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "60" is ambiguous. For example if you are converting from minutes to seconds, 60 is exact, so it has to be treated as having infinite significant digits. To answer your question you need more context.
 
Since there's no decimal point with the '60', it has 1 significant digit.
 
Andy Resnick said:
Since there's no decimal point with the '60', it has 1 significant digit.

On the other hand, if the 60 is meant to be a conversion factor (i.e, between minutes and seconds, or hours and minutes), then it is to be treated as an exact number that doesn't limit the significant figures.

But yes, if it's just part of the data then 1 significant figure, definitely.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Back
Top