Help with some set theory questions

Beno
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Greetings all. I was wondering if someone could give me some asistance on a few simple set theory proofs.

1) An(B\C)=(AnB)\(AnC)
2) A+(B+C)=(A+B)+C where + = symmetric difference
3) If A+B = A+C then B=C
and
4) An(B+C) = (AnB)+(AnC)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Beno! Greetings and welcome to PF! :wink:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
With number 1
An(B\C)=(AnB)\(AnC)
I tried the following
An(B\C) = An(BnC') =(AnB)n(AnC') but this was as far as it seemed to go.

As for the others I think I've worked them out since posting
 
Beno said:
With number 1
An(B\C)=(AnB)\(AnC)
I tried the following
An(B\C) = An(BnC') =(AnB)n(AnC') but this was as far as it seemed to go.

ok, let's do some reverse engineering :wink:

the last step but one is going to be (AnB)n(AnC)' …

work backwards from there. :smile:
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top