Help with understanding resonance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
AI Thread Summary
Resonance occurs when an object is driven at its natural frequency, resulting in amplified oscillations. A singer can break a glass by matching its resonant frequency, causing the glass to vibrate intensely and shatter. While it's theoretically possible to break the glass at any frequency with sufficient amplitude, the efficiency of energy transfer is significantly higher at the resonant frequency. This efficiency is related to the "Q factor," which describes how well an object can absorb energy. Thus, while high amplitude can break the glass, resonant frequencies require less energy to achieve the same effect.
Anonymstudent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am trying to understand resonance, but i haven't wholly grasped the concept.
As far as my knowledge goes, if one evokes a wave upon an object, at the same fundamental frequency as the object, then a standing wave occurs and the object "resonates"

the obvious case is the singer and glass smashing. Singer sings at natural frequency of glass, the wave interferes with the natural vibration and the amplitude goes haywire and breaks the glass. I am assuming that the natural vibration can be neglected, because if it was larger then we would be able to hear a sound coming from it. Thus, won't the glass break no matter the frequency of the singer's waves with a high enough amplitude?
And on the same reasoning, the glass could be smashed if the singer sings at any frequency?

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is that if we drive something at it's natural frequency the oscillations will become very large.

If we look at what is happening actually I think it might help. In the case of the singer the singer is creating a pressure wave which makes the molecules in the air vibrate. This pressure wave causes a force on the glass.

So now that we know that as the singer sings he/she is inadvertently exerting a force on the glass.

Obviously now, if the singer sings loud enough the force will be strong enough to break the glass. Physically it *could* happen but it's pretty much impossible that anyone could sing loud enough.

Or if the singer can hold the right frequency at a relatively loud volume (but still a practical loudness) we can drive the glass into oscillations at resonance, if these vibrations are strong enough the glass will shatter, but at a much lower loudness than in the previous example.

We can think about the energy and the power that we are transferring to the glass in each of these scenarios as well. The louder the singing the larger the pressure wave will be (however it will still propagate with the same frequency regardless of loudness). In the first case we need a large amount of energy in order to shatter the glass and in the second case we needed a relatively smaller amount of energy. This has to do with how well the glass can absorb the energy.

If you look at it what you will find is that energy is more efficiently transmitted to an object if the frequency of the energy is near the resonant frequency of the object. This relates to something that physicists call the "Q factor" or quality factor.

------

So to answer your question, yes, the glass will shatter at a high enough amplitude regardless of frequency. The caveat is that at frequencies far from the resonant frequency the energy we transfer to the glass is a lot less efficient than if we were to transmit energy with a frequency near the resonant frequency. Does that answer your question?
 
Ah, that helps, thanks a lot Feldoh!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top