Help with Velocity: "I Thought I Figured It Out

  • Thread starter Thread starter klm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the direction and distance of a rocket-powered hockey puck moving on a horizontal frictionless table. At t=2 seconds, the velocity components are determined to be vx=16 m/s and vy=30 m/s, resulting in a direction of approximately 61.9 degrees using the inverse tangent function. For the distance from the origin at t=5 seconds, the area under the velocity-time graphs is used to calculate horizontal and vertical displacements, yielding a total displacement of 1.8028 meters from the origin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and motion in two dimensions
  • Familiarity with velocity-time graphs
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically inverse tangent
  • Ability to calculate areas under curves for displacement
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations for two-dimensional motion
  • Learn about the relationship between velocity and displacement in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in vector analysis
  • Practice problems involving projectile motion and graph interpretation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion dynamics in two dimensions.

klm
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
i thought i figured it out, but i didnt

A rocket-powered hockey puck starts from the origin and moves on a horizontal frictionless table. In which direction is the puck moving at t=2s? (B) how far from the origin is the puck at t=5for the first part i just thought i needed to look at t=2 s on both graphs, i guessed that vx=15 and vy=30 then i just found the inverse tan to find the direction to be 63.4 degrees. but that is incorrect
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
klm said:
i thought i figured it out, but i didnt

A rocket-powered hockey puck starts from the origin and moves on a horizontal frictionless table. In which direction is the puck moving at t=2s? (B) how far from the origin is the puck at t=5
nr0upz.jpg



for the first part i just thought i needed to look at t=2 s on both graphs, i guessed that vx=15 and vy=30 then i just found the inverse tan to find the direction to be 63.4 degrees. but that is incorrect
If you look at the slope of the first graph, by determining the vx/t ratio at 5 seconds, you can get exactly what vx is at 2 seconds.
 
i'm sorry i do not understand what you mean? because i think that the slope is equal to (40-30)/(5-4) = 10 , but vx does not equal 10 at t=2s
 
bump please. i am online so if anyone is willing to help and talk me through it that would be great
 
klm said:
i'm sorry i do not understand what you mean? because i think that the slope is equal to (40-30)/(5-4) = 10 , but vx does not equal 10 at t=2s

slope is (40-0)/(5-0) = 8.

So what is vy at t = 2?
 
vy=30 ?
 
so does that mean vx=16 and vy=30. so you just do inverse tan (30/16)= 61.9 and that is the direction?
 
bump. please can someone tell me if i am thinking about this correctly?
 
klm said:
bump. please can someone tell me if i am thinking about this correctly?

Yes, that's correct.
 
  • #10
thank you very much. can you please help me out with the 2nd part as well? how far from the origin is the puck at t=5
 
  • #11
klm said:
thank you very much. can you please help me out with the 2nd part as well? how far from the origin is the puck at t=5

area under the v-t graph gives displacement... area under the vx-t graph gives horizontal displacement. area under the vy-t graph gives vertical displacement.
 
  • #12
okay so do you do for vx .5(5x40)=100 and vy (5x30)=150
then do you take the magnitude?
 
  • #13
klm said:
okay so do you do for vx .5(5x40)=100 and vy (5x30)=150
then do you take the magnitude?

yes, exactly.
 
  • #14
so square root ( 100^2 + 150^2) = 180.28 m ?
 
  • #15
klm said:
so square root ( 100^2 + 150^2) = 180.28 m ?

yes.
 
  • #16
^when i try to put that in, it says it is incorrect.
 
  • #17
klm said:
so square root ( 100^2 + 150^2) = 180.28 m ?

oops sorry... it's 180.28cm = 1.8028m
 
  • #18
oohhh thank you so much! i wouldn't have caught that! thank you for your help!
 
  • #19
klm said:
oohhh thank you so much! i wouldn't have caught that! thank you for your help!

no prob.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
44K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K