Help with work formula - medical application

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a nurse with a back injury when lifting or rolling heavy patients. After suffering a back strain while attempting to roll a 280-pound patient, the nurse seeks a simple formula to estimate the effective weight she is lifting in such situations. It is noted that various factors, such as the patient's body shape and the stiffness of the mattress, affect the lifting force required. A rough estimate suggests that if lifting is done slowly, the force needed could be around half the patient's weight, approximately 140 pounds. However, this figure may vary based on specific circumstances. An experimental approach using a force measuring device is recommended for more accurate assessments. This information aims to help the nurse monitor her lifting actions and adhere to her weight restrictions to prevent further injury.
aliberty
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My wife is a nurse in an intensive care unit. Last year, she suffered a back injury, and has gradually returned to almost full duty. (She has lifting and carrying restrictions placed on her by her physician, limiting the amount of weight she can lift and carry.) A few days ago, she was trying to roll an unresponsive 280 pound patient onto his side. In doing so, she strained her back, and was in pain for a couple of days. Is there a simple formula for us non-physics literate folks that would allow her to determine how much weight she is "lifting" in such a circumstance (i.e., rolling a heavy patient) based on the weight of the patient? This way, she could monitor her actions, and decline to be assigned a patient whose weight would result in exceeding the lift/carry restrictions when she has to roll him or her. Thanks so much in advance for the help.

Art Liberty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The data given is insufficient for such a calculation. A lot will depend on the body shape, stiffness of the mattress, rate of liflting the patient and things like, whether the patient's hand is in the way.

It is possible, however to make an rough estimate. Assuming the lifting is done slowly, the maximum force required would be about half the patient's weight or 140 lbs. If the patient looks more like a cylindrical log than a rectangular block, this number will be less.

An accurate calculation will most likely give a smaller number than 140 but that is a little hard to do with the available info. It might be easier to estimate this experimentally, using some force measuring device like a spring balance.
 
Thanks. I understand this cannot be answered acurately with the limited data, but your rough estimate is helpful and should be sufficient to avoid furthyer injury.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top