Help_How to use graph to find focal length?

AI Thread Summary
To find the focal length of a convex lens using a graph, rearrange the lens equation 1/f = 1/u + 1/v to express 1/v as the subject. This results in the linear equation 1/v = 1/f - 1/u, allowing you to plot 1/v against 1/u. By graphing these values, you can determine the slope, which relates to the focal length. The successful approach involves using 1/u on one axis and 1/v on the other. This method effectively allows for the evaluation of the focal length from the graph.
linda92
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Rearrange the lens equation to make 1/v the subject of the equation and then write it as a linear equation. This will lead you to a possible graph for data of object distances and image distances from which you will be able to evaluate the focal length f of the convex lenses.

Homework Equations


*lens equation: 1/f=1/u+1/v

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really understand what I'm supposed to do. I mean, usually we have equations like y=kx and all we do is to find the slope k. But for the equation 1/v=1/f-1/u ? I really don't get this. Should I make it into v=uf/(u-f)? I think that's the right way but I don't know if i can get f using that equation. Please HELP!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi linda92! Welcome to PF! :wink:

You want a straight line,

so instead of having v along one axis, you have 1/v instead.

And along the other axis, you have … ? :smile:
 


Hello! Thanks :)

The other side I made it 1/u.
In Graphical Analysis I entered the function "f(x)=1/f-x", with x=1/u, f(x)=1/v..

...And it worked :)
 
linda92 said:
...And it worked :)

:biggrin: Woohoo! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top