Learning Rounding & Estimation with Front End Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gamma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Estimation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on learning front-end rounding and estimation techniques in math. A user seeks resources for understanding rounding and estimation, specifically for multiplying and dividing numbers using front-end rounding. Participants explain that front-end rounding involves rounding to the nearest whole number and provide examples for estimating 3.9 * 7.4 and 33.294/6.2. There is also a debate about arranging numbers in ascending order while considering significant figures, with clarification that significant figures apply to measurements rather than exact fractions. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clear explanations and resources for mastering these math concepts.
Gamma
Messages
355
Reaction score
11
I am new to this type of math. I need help....



Can anyone point to me to a good website where I can learn about rounding and stuff.


Here is another one I am struggling with. I looked in the internet could not find one that really explains it well

How to estimated 3.9 * 7.4 using front end rounding?

How to estimated 33.294/6.2, again using front end rounding?

Arrange in assending order the following: 0.321,0.302,8/25

This one look straight forward as 8/25 = 0.32 --> 0.302, 8/25, 0.321
But if I am mindful about sig figures 8/25 = 0.3 and my assending order becomes, 8/25,0.302, 0.321.


Any help or hint is much appreciated.

Thanks,

gamma.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gamma said:
I am new to this type of math. I need help....



Can anyone point to me to a good website where I can learn about rounding and stuff.


Here is another one I am struggling with. I looked in the internet could not find one that really explains it well

How to estimated 3.9 * 7.4 using front end rounding?

I doubt you need a whole website for that! "Front end rounding" just means round to the nearest one digit number. Since 3.9 is closer to 4 than to 3 (since 9> 5) it rounds to 4. 7.4 rounds to 7. What is 4*7?

How to estimated 33.294/6.2, again using front end rounding?

Same idea. 33.294 rounds to 30, 6.2 to 6. What is 30/6?

Arrange in assending order the following: 0.321,0.302,8/25

This one look straight forward as 8/25 = 0.32 --> 0.302, 8/25, 0.321

Good! That's exactly right!

But if I am mindful about sig figures 8/25 = 0.3 and my assending order becomes, 8/25,0.302, 0.321.

No. "significant figures" is only used with approximate figures (like measurements). The integers in a fraction are never approximate. You could think of 8/25 as 8.0000/25.0000 is you like. The correct order is
0.302, 8/25, 0.321 as you gave before.
 
nicely explained... thank you HallsofIvy. These stuff were not in our curriculum during my school days (not usa) and that is hunting me now.

Thanks,

Gamma.
 
Mm, I'd be careful with front-end rounding. There's really no 'standard' way to do it, but it certainly is not your basic rules for rounding, i.e. >5 rounds up. The most common, and simple way, I remember being taught front-end rounding was to simply use the first digit of each number, hence front-end.

For 3.9*7.4, I would bet that this is meant to be 3*7, using front-end. It certainly isn't an accurate approximation, but it's a fast one, and one that I remember being taught.

There are all kinds of 'correction' techniques, but that would vary by the curriculum.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top