Schools Hepth programs in Europe

  • Thread starter Thread starter beatji
  • Start date Start date
beatji
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools.

I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study.

I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests.
But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc).

For your information,
I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia
- one SCI publication (first author) about engineering (cited 18 so far).
and M.S. in physics (GPA:4.0/4.0 but I know it's not that helpful) in Asia
- 3 publications (JHEP, IJMPA, EPJC) about holography (AdS/CFT) + 2 progressing projects (will be published before the admission process)

I think I can become a more competitive applicant in EU than US.

I mainly consider UK/France (for personal reason)/Germany. For the case of France, it is extremely difficult to find information.
Does anyone know how much these schools are competitive compared to US schools?
And please let me know if you know any other good schools in those countries.
I know it only includes top schools so I should include more institutions dealing with string theory, holography (AdS/CFT).
  • Max Planck IMPRS program
  • IMPERIAL
  • CAMBRIDGE
  • KCL
  • Ecole Polytechnique (CPHT)
  • Université Sorbonne, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (LPTHE)
  • Ecole Normale Superieure(LPTENS)
  • Université Paris Cité (APC)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think the M.S. in physics with a 4.0 is isn't that helpful? It may not "count" in the sense that you will have to repeat it, but it will certainly make you a more attractive applicant as it shows you are very capable.
 
Not only is a Master’s degree helpful, it is often a prerequisite to be eligible for a European PhD program. (Local variations apply depending on country)
 
Herman Trivilino said:
What makes you think the M.S. in physics with a 4.0 is isn't that helpful? It may not "count" in the sense that you will have to repeat it, but it will certainly make you a more attractive applicant as it shows you are very capable.
Why would the OP necessarily need to repeat the MS? The OP is talking about PhD programs in Europe, not US. Depends on the strength of the MS program from their home country.
 
CrysPhys said:
Why would the OP necessarily need to repeat the MS?
Some universities require it. Rice U for example. They use it to weed out unqualified Ph.D. candidates. You must get a M.S. degree from them to apply.

I couldn't think of any other reason the OP would think it unhelpful.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top