Hertzian contact pressure & shear stress

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the shear stress associated with Hertzian contact pressure, particularly in the context of spherical objects under load. Participants explore the nature of stresses involved, including normal and shear stresses, and seek visualizations to aid comprehension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the direction of shear stress resulting from Hertz contact pressure and requests a visual aid for better understanding.
  • Another participant notes that Hertz contact theory primarily considers normal stresses and suggests finite element analysis for visualizing shear stress.
  • It is mentioned that compressive stress exists directly under the contact pressure, with shear stress present beneath the surface and laterally.
  • A participant highlights that shear stress is an addition to the normal stress accounted for in Hertz equations.
  • Discussion includes the idea that applied pressure radiates outward and shear stress arises from differential pressure between layers beneath the surface.
  • One participant describes three principal stresses (sigma-x, sigma-y, sigma-z) below the surface, all of which are compressive and decay at different rates with depth.
  • There is a mention of the relationship between shear stress and the difference in principal stresses, with a specific formula provided for calculating shear stress in line contact scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of shear stress in Hertzian contact, with some emphasizing its significance while others maintain that Hertz theory primarily addresses normal stresses. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the complete understanding of shear stress in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific cases of Hertz contact and the need for visual aids to fully grasp the concepts discussed. The mathematical relationships and stress functions mentioned are not universally agreed upon and may vary based on assumptions made.

curiousPep
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Direction of shear stress due to Hertz pressure
Hello,
I am trying to get some intuition about the direction of the shear stress caused by the Hertz contact pressure.
Once I exert some pressure downwards on a spherical object the direction of the Hertz pressure will be upwards.
However, this case some shear stress to exist, but I can't see where the sirection of the shear stress is. Can someone provide a simple sketch it is for visualisation and intuition porpuses.
Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
From what I know, Hertz contact theory assumes that only normal stresses exist. If you want to visualize the shear stress in the contact area, finite element analysis is the best way.

Which case of Hertz contact is of your interest ?
 
There is compressive stress directly under the center of the contact pressure, and shear stress under the surface and off to each side. This diagram, from http://mechdesigner.support/cam-contact-stress-hertz-equations.htm?toc=0&printWindow&, nicely shows it:
Hertz Contact Stress.jpg

This reversing shear stress is the root cause of spalling failures in rolling element bearings and gear teeth. Good search term to learn more is hertz contact stress.
 
jrmichler said:
There is compressive stress directly under the center of the contact pressure, and shear stress under the surface and off to each side.
Yes, but Hertz equations account only for the normal stress. Shear stress is mentioned as an addition to that theory.
 
The applied pressure radiates out from under the contact and is attenuated as depth increases.
The shear stress is the differential pressure between those successive layers.

jrmichler said:
This reversing shear stress is the root cause of spalling failures in rolling element bearings and gear teeth.
True. A very small lubricant filled pit, in the surface of a ball or roller, can rapidly spall the surface by providing a very high differential fluid pressure at the edge of the contact area.
 
There are three principal Stresses below the surface: sigma-x, sigma-y, and sigma-z.
- they are all compressive.
These stresses are in the direction of rolling, across the direction of rolling, and vertically down, respectively.

When they are plotted, from '0mm' at the surface to below the surface, they are all different, and 'decay' at different rates to a very small value at about 4 x the width of contact below the surface.
Because the stress functions are different, you can plot, at each 'slice' below the surface, the difference in sigma-x and sigma-y (for line contact) their values, which is the Shear-Stress, as (Sigma-x - Sigma-y)/2. This difference reaches a maximum of about 0.78 x the width of the contact.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
33K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K