Heterotic strings (another question for experts)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demystifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
14,574
Reaction score
7,170
The problem with bosonic strings is the fact that they contain a tachyon.
Why that is not a problem for the bosonic part of heterotic strings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "standard" heterotic string is not a direct product of a (left-moving) bosonic string with a (right-moving) superstring, but it is a "correlated" product. That's why the bosonic string tachyon does not need to appear, and in fact it cannot appear if the theory has space-time supersymmetry (as applies for the standard SUSY 10d heterotic string).

But one can also construct heterotic strings without supersymmetry, either in ten or in less than ten dimensions. In these cases tachyons typically do appear.
 
Now I am able to answer my question by myself.
The point is that the tachyon is the GROUND STATE of the string, which is a unique state. Thus, there is not a right-moving tachyon and a left-moving tachyon, but only one tachyon.
In the heterotic theory we have supersymmetry only in the right sector, so we can apply the GSO projection only in that sector, but the tachyon is a common state of BOTH sectors. Therefore, the GSO projection that removes tachyon from the right sector removes it also from the left sector as well.

Now it seems simple, but it took time until I realized that simple point. :)
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top