Jarfi said:
Yer.. I'm lazy and tired, did not enough research and found out that the radio/electromagnetic wave makes all the electrons move back and forth when the wave oscillates between the magnetic and electric fields... so you can see how much the current oscillates etc.
In order for the electrons to move back and forth, they have to absorb a large number of radio photons. However, there are so many photons in the "radio wave" that the absorption of one or two photons doesn't affect the wave as much. The radio wave changes, but it isn't really a "collapse".
The word "collapse" is accurate only for waves that contain only one particle. If the wave has a sufficiently large amplitude, there are many particles associated with that wave. So the disappearance of one photon in the wave doesn't change the wave in a catastrophic manner.
Jarfi said:
But... um cameras work differently,
No they don't. Not really. The film is exposed by chemical reactions. However, chemical reactions involve electric currents on an atomic and molecular level. The formation of chemical bonds involves electric currents of small spatial extent.
One can get a small amount of distance into this by considering chemical bonds as a type of antennae. I mean, there are differences due to the difference in scale. However, there is a correspondence between the rules of photochemistry and the rules of induction.
In silver nitride crystals, there is a threshold in photon number required before the silver is oxidized. It takes about 10 photons absorbed before a particle of silver nitride changes color. So really, the "collapse" is divided between at least 10 photons. This means that in terms of the electromagnetic field, the photochemical process in standard film can be considered "classical". Quantum mechanics is somewhat involved in modelling the energy levels of the electrons in the silver nitride particles.
Jarfi said:
the wave collapses so you get one signal of a wave and colour, much simpler... what about quantum mechanics, don't the large wavelengths collapse as much?
As a heuristic condition, assume that the threshold energy for detection is about the same in antennae and film. The smaller the frequency, the less energy each photon has. Therefore, there smaller the frequency the more photons there are associated with that small amount of threshold energy.
Radio waves have a smaller energy than light waves. Therefore, radio waves have more photons per unit amount of total energy. Therefore, the "collapse" of anyone photon is less noticeable in radio wave antennae than in light wave film.
Jarfi said:
Well in general I don't know well enough how long wavelength EM-waves are detected, I've seen those pics from deep space where they detected intergalatic radiation.
Anybody care to explain? or give links, names of phenemonas etc? I'm curios I NEED to know this.
I suggest that you try going the other way. Try to look for explanations in "classical electrodynamics" for understanding "optics". Try thinking in classical terms first, and then modifying your thinking to take quantum mechanics into account.
For instance, start thinking of chemical bonds as being like radio wave antennae. Then, add a few changes to your picture to include the effect of photons.