Hi guys, i was studying on transformers losses, i in some

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the understanding of transformer losses, specifically addressing the open-circuit test and its relation to excitation and copper losses. It is established that the open-circuit test primarily reveals excitation losses, while i2R losses are not present due to the absence of load. The magnetizing current, which is the only current present during the open-circuit test, is typically small for quality transformers but can be significant in some cases. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing the conditions under which magnetizing current can be considered negligible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformer operation and losses
  • Knowledge of open-circuit and short-circuit testing methods
  • Familiarity with magnetizing current concepts
  • Basic electrical engineering principles related to current and resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of transformer losses in detail
  • Learn about the significance of open-circuit and short-circuit tests in transformer analysis
  • Study the effects of magnetizing current on transformer performance
  • Explore methods to minimize copper losses in transformers
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying power systems, and professionals involved in transformer design and testing will benefit from this discussion.

aaqeel123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi guys, i was studying on transformers losses, i need help in some problems.

why open-circuit test show only excitation losses and not i2R losses..

thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What reference are you referring to that seems to ignore copper losses?
 


think about that for a moment

what is magnitude of current in open circuit test?

just magnetizing current 'cause there's no load on transformer...
which for a quality transformer should be small (though not zero)
and when you express it as a fraction of rated current and square that it gets even smaller


so if your text did not state that the magnetizing current is small enough to ignore then it was an error of omission by the author,

and it is not always the case that magnetizing current is negligible...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K