Hi guys, im having some doubts getting this exercise:20,0 g of

  • Thread starter Thread starter ignacioserra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubts Hi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a chemistry exercise involving the reaction of iron with sulfuric acid to produce iron(II) sulfate and hydrogen. Participants highlight the importance of determining the limiting reactant, which cannot be accurately assessed without knowing the amount of sulfuric acid present. The correct approach involves calculating the mass and moles of iron based on its purity before applying stoichiometry to find the products' mass and volume. There is confusion regarding the initial sample's composition, as the 20 g sample contains only 60% iron, not pure iron. Accurate calculations must follow the stoichiometric relationships of the reaction to derive the correct answers.
ignacioserra
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I am having some doubts getting this exercise:

20,0 g of iron (60% purity) are reacted with sulphuric acid (80 % pure) Iron (II) sulphate and hydrogen are formed:

Fe + H2SO4 → H2 + FeSO4

1. Which is the limiting reactant?
2. How much Iron (II) sulphate will be obtained?
3. What volume (r.t.p) of H2 (g) will be obtained?
4. What volume would be obtained if the yield were just 80 %?
5. How much iron should be used in this case if the amount calculated in (2) were to be obtained=

Info
Ar(H)= 1 Ar(O)= 16 Ar (Fe)= 56
Molar volume (r.t.p) 24dm^3

So,
Iron(II) Sulphate mass= 56 + 32 + (16x4) = 152
is that the iron sulphate obtained?

answer to number 5 should the be: 152/0.8?

please, I am needing some help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


How much iron in the sample? How many moles is it?

But there is something wrong - you are not told how much sulfuric acid was present, so question about a limiting reagent doesn't make sense.
 


20 g of iron.
should I do 152/20?
 


ignacioserra said:
20 g of iron.

No, there is no 20 g of iron. There is a 20g sample that contains 60% iron, that's not the same.

should I do 152/20?

Guessing won't get you far.

You have to follow the stoichiometry. That means calculating mass of the iron, calculating number of moles of the iron, calculating number of moles of products (from the reaction stoichiometry), then converting these moles to mass and volume. In this exact order.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top