How does gravity affect the passage of time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AcrylicAce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading
AcrylicAce
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I just started reading "The Elegant Universe" as an introduction to physics. Up to this point I thought I understood everything but now I get a to a part that doesn't make sense to me and was hoping someone could explain it.

If you have the book you can follow along with what I am talking about... at the bottom of page 74 and beginning of page 75 he talks about George and Gracie floating in space, each with large digital clocks attached to them. He also states there is a line attached to a nearby spaceship and then to the sun. As George pulls himself toward the sun Brian Greene states that his clock will go slower and slower the closer he gets to the sun. This seems contradictory to what has been said about time previously... the faster an object is moving the slower time goes. Because Gracie is farther away from the sun (takes her longer to make one orbit around the sun) then she is moving faster than George and so Gracie's time clock should be moving slower than George's.

If you do not have the book and don't understand what I am asking... basically I think what I am trying to understand is: How does gravity affect time?

I'm am not sure what it is that I do not understand but if someone could explain it to me I would really appreciate it. Like I said, I am very new to this so please explain in very general easy to understand terms.

Thanks,
AcrylicAce
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't know if it is possible to explain accurately without diving into the mathematics of GR. In a simplified way, the deeper you are in a gravitational potential well, the slower your clock ticks as observed by observers far away from any gravitational influence.
 


You don't need General Relativity, just...
AcrylicAce said:
Because Gracie is farther away from the sun (takes her longer to make one orbit around the sun) then she is moving faster than George
Are you quite sure? Haven't you forgotten Kepler's 3rd law?
 


AcrylicAce said:
Hi,
I just started reading "The Elegant Universe" as an introduction to physics. Up to this point I thought I understood everything but now I get a to a part that doesn't make sense to me and was hoping someone could explain it.

If you have the book you can follow along with what I am talking about... at the bottom of page 74 and beginning of page 75 he talks about George and Gracie floating in space, each with large digital clocks attached to them. He also states there is a line attached to a nearby spaceship and then to the sun. As George pulls himself toward the sun Brian Greene states that his clock will go slower and slower the closer he gets to the sun. This seems contradictory to what has been said about time previously... the faster an object is moving the slower time goes. Because Gracie is farther away from the sun (takes her longer to make one orbit around the sun) then she is moving faster than George and so Gracie's time clock should be moving slower than George's.

If you do not have the book and don't understand what I am asking... basically I think what I am trying to understand is: How does gravity affect time?

I'm am not sure what it is that I do not understand but if someone could explain it to me I would really appreciate it. Like I said, I am very new to this so please explain in very general easy to understand terms.

Thanks,
AcrylicAce

I just read the excerpt and in simple easy to understand terms: Greene didn't say they were orbiting the sun.

Given that, you were right to be confused, great insight! As Greene mentions, the effect of gravitational time dilation in our solar system is small, and relative velocity may have had a larger impact.

A decent real world analogy to objects experiencing both types of time dilation are satellites. I think for GPS satellites the dilation caused by relative velocity outpaces that of gravitational dilation.
 


xts said:
You don't need General Relativity, just...

Are you quite sure? Haven't you forgotten Kepler's 3rd law?

Certainly have NOT forgotten Kepler's 3rd law... I just stated in my original post that I am reading this book as in introduction to physics... I have never learned Kepler's 3rd law. Thanks for the input though.

So... to reply to the others that posted... Is he talking about just gravity and for simplicity's sake not talking about the orbit around the sun?

I'm sorry... I still don't completely understand. The more gravitational force the slower time moves relative to an outside observer?
 


AcrylicAce;3436931iut said:
I'm sorry... I still don't completely understand. The more gravitational force the slower time moves relative to an outside observer?
Yes. Time is passing a bit slower here at the bottom of our gravitational well than it is up on board the ISS.

Here is a link about a guy that demonstrated this with nothing more than a super accurate clock, a camper van and a family vacation up into the mountains!

http://leapsecond.com/great2005/

Executive summary: After 2 days spent at an altitude of 5400 feet, his Cesium clocks has gained 22 nanoseconds.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top