Hidden variables - Bell - The Law of Malus?

  • Thread starter Zafa Pi
  • Start date
  • #1
631
132

Main Question or Discussion Point

Invariably in the lay literature when it comes time to show that EPR hidden variables are incompatible with QM, Bell's Theorem is invoked (e.g. Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos", Zeilinger's "Dance of the Photons", Rosenblum's "Quantum Enigma", ...).

I don't see why a simple application of Malus' Law (old as the hills) doesn't accomplish it, to wit:
If we have a zillion vertically polarized photons beamed into a polarized lens whose axis is rotated 30° to the right of vertical (R30°), then about 3/4 get thru. So that 3/4 have been tagged (hidden) with the instruction to pass thru R30°. The same goes for L30°. Thus at least 1/2 of the zillion have been tagged to go thru both. But Malus tells us that only 1/4 go thru both.

I haven't found a thread that mentions this. Nor do I see why this doesn't refute hidden variables.
Admittedly to refute local realism one seems to need something like Bell's Theorem with entangled pairs.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
631
132
I'm sorry I didn't think this thru. Once a tagged photon passes thru R30° it's no longer vertically polarized so there is no tag for L30°.
 

Related Threads on Hidden variables - Bell - The Law of Malus?

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
411
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
66
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
1K
Top