I Higgsino: The Supersymmetric Partner of the Higgs - What You Need to Know

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter hyksos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs
hyksos
Messages
35
Reaction score
11
TL;DR Summary
SUSY supersymmetry Higgsino
Supersymmetric partners are expected to only pair off with "fundamental" particles of the Standard Model. (photon, W, Z, gluons, leptons, quarks, graviton). In all those canonical particles, the SUSY partner is significantly more massive than its counterpart.

Internet sources suggest that unofficial name of the supersymmetric partner to the Higgs is the "Higgsino". Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson. Does this low mass mean we should have already found the Higgsino in experiments?

Any other notes we should know about the Higgsino?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hyksos said:
Internet sources

Hey why look at those stuffy old peer-reviewed papers when you have a couple of guys on the internet?

hyksos said:
Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson.

I think you just made this up. You didn't give a source, and if you did get it from elsewhere, they don't know what they are talking about.
  1. In SUSY, the SM Higgs sector has at least five particles.
  2. There are therefore five SUSY partners.
  3. These particles mix with gauginos, so in general there is no particle that is a pure "higgsino".
  4. Obviously then a statement about mass is meaningless.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
hyksos said:
Supersymmetric partners are expected to only pair off with "fundamental" particles of the Standard Model. (photon, W, Z, gluons, leptons, quarks, graviton). In all those canonical particles, the SUSY partner is significantly more massive than its counterpart.

Internet sources suggest that unofficial name of the supersymmetric partner to the Higgs is the "Higgsino". Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson.

Please give specific references for these claims; "Internet sources" is not enough.
 
PeterDonis said:
Please give specific references for these claims; "Internet sources" is not enough.
Roger Penrose has claimed that spin-0 particles would in all cases be more massive than their superpartners. This would also include the Higgs being more massive than its superpartner, the Higgsino, ( as the Higgs is spin-0. ) He seems to imply that this follows from the non-existence of negative spin.

This claim appears on page 875, chapter 31, section 2 of the following book.

The Road to Reality A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe.
Vintage; Reprint edition (January 9, 2007)
ISBN-10: 0679776311

ISBN-13: 978-0679776314
 
hyksos said:
This claim appears on page 875, chapter 31, section 2 of the following book.

This is a pop science book, not a textbook or peer-reviewed paper. As such, it is not a valid source for PF discussion.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top