High Order Polynomials: Questions & Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter azzaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
azzaz
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello

I am working on high order polynomials and I have two questions:1. Is there a method other than the one based on the "synthetic division with testing the signs" for identifying the lower and upper limits of the real roots?

2. Is there a way for identifying the smallest interval on the x-axis between two successive real roots, i.e. is there a theorem or test that can provide a limit on the size of the x-interval that separates successive real roots without knowing the roots?

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
azzaz said:
Hello

I am working on high order polynomials and I have two questions:1. Is there a method other than the one based on the "synthetic division with testing the signs" for identifying the lower and upper limits of the real roots?

2. Is there a way for identifying the smallest interval on the x-axis between two successive real roots, i.e. is there a theorem or test that can provide a limit on the size of the x-interval that separates successive real roots without knowing the roots?

Thank you for your help!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturm's_theorem

The above describes a method to obtain intervals to bracket individual real roots. I believe it can be adapted to answer your questions.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top