High school Physics - Simple Harmonic Motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of a simple harmonic motion problem involving a penguin jumping on a bungee cord. The user calculated the equilibrium position where gravitational force equals elastic force, determining a distance of 4.2193 meters. The conversation highlights the importance of energy conservation principles, specifically the relationship between gravitational potential energy (Eg), kinetic energy (Ek), and elastic potential energy (Ee). The user ultimately derived a maximum distance of 23.6 meters after solving a quadratic equation, confirming the correctness of their approach while clarifying the role of elastic potential energy in the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Knowledge of energy conservation laws in physics
  • Familiarity with gravitational potential energy (Eg) and kinetic energy (Ek)
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations in physics contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic potential energy (EPE) in bungee systems
  • Learn about energy conservation in oscillatory motion
  • Explore kinematic equations and their applications in motion analysis
  • Investigate the effects of damping and external forces on simple harmonic motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of simple harmonic motion and energy conservation in real-world applications.

bigbosswilly
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Penny (m=31kg) is learning to fly. She is attached to a 9.5m long bungee cord that has a spring constant of 72N/m. She jumps off the platform with an initial velocity of 3.5m/s [up]. Calculate the maximum distance below the platform that penny will reach (before bouncing back up).
Relevant Equations
Energy conservation, Forces equations, Energy equations
I started off by finding when Fg=Fx:

(72)(x)=(31)(9.8)
x=4.2193m

After this I'm stuck and have a few things I'm confused about:

When the penguin's jumping, is there elastic energy? (because the rope's getting compressed? Or maybe not). Also, I know you can use energy conservation, but there's too many variables and I can't solve it.

For example, I tried:

Et1= Et2
Eg + Ek = Ee (when the penguin's jumping and at the maximum distance below ledge with reference level set there as well, so no Eg)
(9.8)(31)(h) + (0.5)(31)(-3.5)^2 = (0.5)(72)(x^2)

I don't have the answer to this problem, sorry, but I was still hoping someone can help guide me through.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigbosswilly said:
I started off by finding when Fg=Fx:

(72)(x)=(31)(9.8)
x=4.2193m
This would be true in equilibrium. But Penny moves up and down at the end of the cord.
bigbosswilly said:
After this I'm stuck and have a few things I'm confused about:

When the penguin's jumping, is there elastic energy? (because the rope's getting compressed? Or maybe not).
No, the cord can not be compressed. Have you seen bungee-jumping? the cord is slack initially. See
bigbosswilly said:
Also, I know you can use energy conservation, but there's too many variables and I can't solve it.

For example, I tried:

Et1= Et2
Eg + Ek = Ee (when the penguin's jumping and at the maximum distance below ledge with reference level set there as well, so no Eg)
(9.8)(31)(h) + (0.5)(31)(-3.5)^2 = (0.5)(72)(x^2)

I don't have the answer to this problem, sorry, but I was still hoping someone can help guide me through.
Energy conservation is a good start, but what is Penny's state at the start of the jump, and what is it at the deepest point? What energies it has? And please explain your notations, x and h.
 
ehild said:
This would be true in equilibrium. But Penny moves up and down at the end of the cord.

No, the cord can not be compressed. Have you seen bungee-jumping? the cord is slack initially. See

Energy conservation is a good start, but what is Penny's state at the start of the jump, and what is it at the deepest point? What energies it has? And please explain your notations, x and h.


Sorry, I'm not exactly sure how to use this site yet and the quoting functions so I hope this simple reply format is ok.

For the x=4.1m, that was me trying to find the amplitude of the system (thinking back on it however, it wasn't helpful). The fact that there's no elastic energy makes a LOT more sense haha (great video too!). For the "h" and "x" variables, I set the reference point at the ledge so "h" represents the height Penny jumps above the ledge and "x" represented the stretching distance at the maximum distance at the bottom.

So I've been thinking a bit more, and managed to find an answer this way but am not sure if it is correct:

I first used kinematics to find the velocity of Penny at x=0

d= 9.5m
vi= -3.5m/s
a= 9.8m/s^2
vf= ?

I got final velocity equal to approximately 13.64 m/s [down]

I then set my reference point at maximum distance below the ledge, and set the energy of Penny when jumping equal to the energy of Penny at the maximum distance below the ledge:

Et1 = Et2
Eg + Ek = Ee
(31)(9.8)(x) + (0.5)(31)(13.64)^2 = (0.5)(72)(x^2)
303.8x + 2886.1 = 36x^2
0 = 36x^2 - 303.8x - 2886.1

I solved the quadratic and got two answers, 14m and -5m, the latter which I rejected. The maximum distance would be 9.5m + 14m, therefore the max distance would be 23.6m

Would this be correct?
 
Last edited:
bigbosswilly said:
Sorry, I'm not exactly sure how to use this site yet and the quoting functions so I hope this simple reply format is ok.

For the x=4.1m, that was me trying to find the amplitude of the system (thinking back on it however, it wasn't helpful). The fact that there's no elastic energy makes a LOT more sense haha (great video too!). For the "h" and "x" variables, I set the reference point at the ledge so "h" represents the height Penny jumps above the ledge and "x" represented the stretching distance at the maximum distance at the bottom.

So I've been thinking a bit more, and managed to find an answer this way but am not sure if it is correct:

I first used kinematics to find the velocity of Penny at x=0

d= 9.5m
vi= -3.5m/s
a= 9.8m/s^2
vf= ?

I got final velocity equal to approximately 13.64 m/s [down]

I then set my reference point at x=0, and set the energy of Penny when jumping equal to the energy of Penny at the maximum distance below the ledge:

Et1 = Et2
Eg + Ek = Ee
(31)(9.8)(x) + (0.5)(31)(13.64)^2 = (0.5)(72)(x^2)
303.8x + 2886.1 = 36x^2
0 = 36x^2 - 303.8x - 2886.1

I solved the quadratic and got two answers, 14m and -5m, the latter which I rejected. The maximum distance would be 9.5m + 14m, therefore the max distance would be 23.6m

Would this be correct?

Right method, but you should think about your EPE term. More specifically, does it start storing energy as soon as she drops (i.e. is it at all slack during the descent)? Hint: strings store EPE when they are stretched beyond their initial length (I am assuming you do indeed mean a string rather than a spring)? You should be able to make some quick adjustments and solve from there.
 
Master1022 said:
Right method, but you should think about your EPE term. More specifically, does it start storing energy as soon as she drops (i.e. is it at all slack during the descent)? Hint: strings store EPE when they are stretched beyond their initial length (I am assuming you do indeed mean a string rather than a spring)? You should be able to make some quick adjustments and solve from there.

I think it does not start storing energy as she drops? I assumed that the string would not be compressed or stretched for 9.5m down as it is the length of the string.
 
bigbosswilly said:
I think it does not start storing energy as she drops? I assumed that the string would not be compressed or stretched for 9.5m down as it is the length of the string.

Oh my apologies, I see you have gone through and set x at equilibrium. In that case, your answer should be correct. However, I think it would be much easier to go straight from the top to the bottom (initial KE + GPE loss ---> EPE gain) so you wouldn't need to worry about this extra middle calculation. That is often the great thing about energy arguments- you can go from beginning to end and not necessarily worry about what happened in between.
 
Master1022 said:
Oh my apologies, I see you have gone through and set x at equilibrium. In that case, your answer should be correct. However, I think it would be much easier to go straight from the top to the bottom (initial KE + GPE loss ---> EPE gain) so you wouldn't need to worry about this extra middle calculation. That is often the great thing about energy arguments- you can go from beginning to end and not necessarily worry about what happened in between.

Thank you very much for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
957
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K