High speeds due to gravitaional forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter joeyjo100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
A massive body can theoretically accelerate a 1 kg mass to high speeds, but it cannot reach or exceed the speed of light due to relativistic limitations. The maximum velocity achievable is determined by the escape velocity of the massive body, which depends on its mass and radius. If a projectile is fired with sufficient kinetic energy, it can exceed escape velocity, provided it is aimed correctly at the massive body. The discussion emphasizes the importance of initial conditions, such as the projectile's velocity and distance from the massive body. Ultimately, while high speeds can be achieved, the laws of physics prevent reaching light speed.
joeyjo100
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Is it possible for a massive body to accelerate an object, say a 1kg mass, to a speed which is light speed or near light speed? What mass would this body have to be, and how far away would the 1 kg mass have to be?


I'm looking for an answer that doesn't involve relativistic stuff, mainly because i don't understand it... :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition, any time you're asking about getting close to the speed of light---thats relativistic. Also, note that you can never reach or exceed the speed of light.

You can do a Newtonian approximation to your question, the projectile motion equation for velocity is
V_f^2 = V_i^2 + 2ad
for final velocity V_f, initial velocity V_i, acceleration a, and distance d.
Do you know how to find the acceleration between two massive point particles?
 
The maximum velocity you can get for a given body is the same as the escape velocity for that body. It will depend on the radius and mass of the massive body only. You can find it from energy conservation. You start with your 1 kg mass very far away (PE=0, KE=0) and then you approach the body till you reach the surface.
 
nasu said:
The maximum velocity you can get for a given body is the same as the escape velocity for that body. It will depend on the radius and mass of the massive body only. You can find it from energy conservation. You start with your 1 kg mass very far away (PE=0, KE=0) and then you approach the body till you reach the surface.

This isn't true. Fire a projectile at the Sun at a speed greater than the escape velocity of the Sun (about 600 km/s) and you'll of course accelerate to a speed faster than the escape velocity. The only issue is if you miss the Sun, it will fly off and never become captured by the Sun. However, if you aim right at it, you'll accelerate to quite a high speed!

And that's quite an extreme case, simply fire projectile with a kinetic energy greater than the potential energy of the object at whatever radii it is at and you'll achieve a speed greater than the escape velocity.
 
Right. I did not think the body having some velocity already.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top