Higher frequency => higher energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter LLT71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Frequency
AI Thread Summary
High-frequency waves have higher energy because the energy of each photon is directly proportional to its frequency, as described by the equation E=hf, where h is Planck's constant. While the energy of a wave is also related to its amplitude, which correlates with the number of photons, the frequency itself plays a crucial role in determining energy levels. Higher frequency oscillations require a stronger restoring force, indicating that more energy is needed to achieve the same displacement. Additionally, a higher frequency results in more peaks and troughs in the wave, contributing to increased energy. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between frequency and energy in waves.
LLT71
Messages
73
Reaction score
5
can someone explain why high frequency waves contain higher energy?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If these are EM waves we are talking about, then each photon has energy equal to hf where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the wave. To say that high frequency waves "contain" higher energy is not quite correct. The energy of a wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, which is related to the number of photons. So certainly it is correct to say that a photon of higher frequency has higher energy.
 
  • Like
Likes LLT71
LLT71 said:
can someone explain why high frequency waves contain higher energy?
One intuitive answer:
All else being the same, it takes a stronger restoring force to produce a higher frequency oscillation - the easiest way to see this is to play around with the equation for a simple harmonic oscillator. A stronger restoring force means more energy is needed to produce the same displacement.

Another intuitive answer: The energy of a wave is in whatever pushes the peaks up and the troughs down. A higher frequency means more peaks and troughs, hence more energy.

Both of these answers are imprecise and hand-wavy descriptions of something that is clear and precise in the math.
 
  • Like
Likes LLT71
thank you guys!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top