Highest frequency before mechanical failure

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the frequency limits of materials before mechanical failure, particularly in the context of using high-frequency vibrations to move particles on surfaces. Key properties influencing this include elasticity, shape, size, and any defects in the material, with crystalline silicon wafers noted for their brittleness. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding resonant frequencies and suggests that basic equations for simple 2D shapes may exist, although they may not be widely known. For more complex structures, Finite Element Analysis is recommended for accurate predictions. Resources like Blevins' "Formulas for Natural Frequency and Mode Shape" are suggested for foundational knowledge in this area.
jeberd
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am wondering what property of a material would be of interest (or better yet if you knew some formulas that describe this property) if I want to know what frequencies different materials could handle.

I am thinking along the lines of "the fat lady singing" and reaching that high note that breaks all of the crystal in the room. I imagine that this is a property of both frequency and amplitude and has to do with the elasticity of the material.

I am working on a project wherein I propose using high frequency vibrations to move particles across the surface of a substrate, and I predict getting questions along the line of "but won't that just cause it to break"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most materials won't break no matter what the frequency is (I am assuming now that the material is simply vibrating, not shearing etc). And even objects that are made from materials that DO break (such as glas) will do so at a frequency that will depend on the particular properties of that object: the shape (which will determine the resonance frequencies), size, defects, cracks etc
 
Last edited:
I am primarily thinking about silicon wafers (which are only 500 microns thick and crystalline silicon is brittle).

Also, do you know where I would find the equations for resonant frequencies of shapes?
 
DaleSpam said:
This is closely related to the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=276617" earlier this week.

Yes, but I am interested in simple 2-d shapes. I imagined that these equations exist as a standard set for basic shapes but it may not be the case.

Possibly of interest is this video: http://www.coolestone.com/media/124/Seeing_Sound_Waves_-_Awesome/" which illustrates what I would like to calculate. If there is a way to do it, I would like to determine the locations of the lines mathematically, by numerical methods if required.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For simple structures this is reasonably straight forward. For a variety of simple shapes (columns, beams, plates) one can estimate the mode shapes and associated natural frequencies. These are related to, amongst other things, boundary conditions, structure material properties, and geometry. A good place to start would be Blevins' 'Formulas for Natural Frequency and Mode Shape'.

For more complicated structures you would generally carry out this analysis using Finite Element Analysis. By generating a computer model of the problem and sub-dividing the structure into many smaller elements (by generating what is known as a mesh), it is possible to estimate with varying degrees of accuracy what will happen. Depending on your abilities or resources available to you though, this probably will not be an easy thing to teach yourself to do.

As I said, if it's just a simple case such as an edge clamped or simply supported symmetrical plate, Blevins will give you the tools with which to predict what you are after.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top