Highest Scoring Entry for 2007 Physics World Quiz Contest?

AI Thread Summary
A discussion revolves around a quiz from Physics World offering a £50 prize for correct answers. Participants share insights on various quiz questions, particularly focusing on the significance of a radiation symbol used for dangerous sources, which is intended to warn against dismantling devices containing hazardous materials. The conversation includes references to notable scientific experiments and figures, such as the Karlsruhe tritium neutrino experiment and Helmut Groettrup, a German scientist involved in Soviet missile technology. Participants express a desire for a member of the forum to win the prize, suggesting that any winnings should benefit the forum. There is a collaborative effort to compile answers, with some members debating the accuracy of their responses and the potential for submitting multiple answers. The thread highlights a mix of scientific trivia and community engagement among physics enthusiasts.
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,814
Reaction score
4,725
Hey, Physics World has http://images.iop.org/dl/physicsweb/PWDec07quiz.pdf" from 2007. There's a £50 prize for someone who gets most of the answer.

Wouldn't it be nice if a PF member wins this? :)

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've got the answer for "B" at the top of the page concerning this sign:

http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/images/newradiationsymbol_300x200.gif


The image in the top portion of the triangle is a fan blade----these signs are in public bathrooms. So the sign indicates, if the fan isn't working---it's best to leave at a fast pace!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A. Karlsruhe tritium neutrino experiment.[/color]
Source:
http://www2.lns.mit.edu/neutrino/KATRIN.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
B.
The symbol is intended for IAEA Category 1, 2 and 3 sources defined as dangerous sources capable of death or serious injury, including food irradiators, teletherapy machines for cancer treatment and industrial radiography units. The symbol is to be placed on the device housing the source, as a warning not to dismantle the device or to get any closer. It will not be visible under normal use, only if someone attempts to disassemble the device. The symbol will not be located on building access doors, transportation packages or containers.
[/color]
Source:
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2007/radiationsymbol.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
D:

Cassini

Source:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap071010.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.

Hawking

Source:
http://www.news.com/2300-11397_3-6179718-1.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
3.

University of Florida

Source:
http://news.ufl.edu/2007/05/30/huge-wind-machine/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
6.

Sunshine

Source:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448134/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
rewebster said:
The image in the top portion of the triangle is a fan blade----these signs are in public bathrooms. So the sign indicates, if the fan isn't working---it's best to leave at a fast pace!
One thing's for sure, it ain't the entrance to the Trilateral Commision.
 
  • #12
I know the answers to 11. through 18.
 
  • #13
7.

During a a high-pressure test of critical components:
"At 20 bar, there was a sudden release of helium gas (used to cool the magnets), something went bang, and sirens sounded, alerting the fire brigade."

Source:
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/may07/5083"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
8.

carbon nanotubes.

Source:
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0953-8984/19/39/395001/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
9.

Borexino.

Source:
http://www.w2agz.com/Library/SuperGrid/Popular%20Articles/PWJul07news_paul_grant.pdf"
(article near the bottom entitled: Neutrino detector finally starts up.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
20.

184 pounds

Source:
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/museum/sputnik1.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
24.

30 days

Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_1"
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_2"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
So Jimmy, are you going to enter this contest or what? :)

Zz.
 
  • #21
I think if anyone enters from this thread then the money should go to PF.
 
  • #22
ZapperZ said:
So Jimmy, are you going to enter this contest or what? :)
Zz.
I might if I get all of them. I assume there are many people who can google as well as or better than I.
 
  • #23
23.

Korolev?

I'm not sure about this one. My guy spent only 6 years in prison and only a part of that in a labor camp. It was before, not after sputnik.
Source:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14949640"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
22.

Inside were two one-watt radio transmitters and three silver-zinc batteries - two for powering the radio beacons and one for a ventilation fan. The sphere was filled with nitrogen gas pressurised to 130 kilopascals (1.3 atmospheres).

Source:
This article mentions some of the equipment, but I don't know if it is an exhaustive list.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6937964.stm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
20. I can't find this one. Here's an article that suggests that there was no such person.
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/gorodomlya.html"
Perhaps he was the janitor and kept the keys. Anybody got a better answer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
5.

Nordic skiing

Source:
http://www.space-travel.com/reports/Astronauts_Urged_To_Take_Up_Skiing_Ahead_Of_Lunar_Missions_999.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
C.

Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker

Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%C3%A4cker"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #28
11.

John Polkinghorne

Source:
http://www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/faraday/Issues.php"

13.

Steven Weinberg

Source:
http://www.templeton-cambridge.org/fellows/brooks/publications/2006.11.20/beyond_belief/"

14.

Sir Patrick Moore

Source:
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/celebrity/article1308585.ece"

15.

Freeman Dyson

Source:
http://edge.org/3rd_culture/dysonf07/dysonf07_index.html"

16.

Ken Caldeira

Source:
http://www.nasw.org/users/schirber/bibliography/pdfs/PWFeb07news-geoengineering.pdf"

17.

Frank Close

Source:
http://trust.mindswap.org/downloads/PWJan07web-two.pdf"

18.

John Conway

Source:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/27731"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
It seems I have found all except for 12 and 20. George Jones has the answer to 12. If someone gets 20, then we should follow Kurdt's suggestion and send the lot in as physicsforums.
 
  • #30
Oswald Putze might be the answer to 20. I tried googling his name and he was certainly involved but there's not much info on him. I thought he'd at least have a wiki article if he was the one.
 
  • #31
Regarding 20,
I found a german article about German scientists being deported to the soviet union in 1946 and forced to work on soviet war technology.
http://www.mdr.de/doku/archiv/geschichte/3420056.html"

There is a scientist, named Helmut Groettrup, mentioned
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Gröttrup"
but it seems, he worked on rockets, not on missiles. Funnily, rockets and missiles translate to the same word in German: Rakete. So, maybe there's a translation error somewhere in the question?

I can't google up anything else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #32
Thats probably better than old Oswald.

A rocket and a missile are essentially the same thing.
 
  • #33
jimmysnyder said:
It seems I have found all except for 12 and 20.

:confused:

If you have 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, don't you have 12 by the process of elimination?

12 was probably the easiest question on the quiz, because I am familiar with the guy's situation. He's moving from the U.S. to Canada, in part, because of the athletics programmes at U.S. universities.
 
  • #34
physarrista said:
Regarding 20,
I found a german article about German scientists being deported to the soviet union in 1946 and forced to work on soviet war technology.
http://www.mdr.de/doku/archiv/geschichte/3420056.html"

There is a scientist, named Helmut Groettrup, mentioned
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Gröttrup"
There were a number of German rocket scientists who worked for the Soviets after the war. As near as I can tell, they were all let go before sputnik. For instance, in the link you provided, it says Helmut was allowed to return to Germany in 1955, two years before sputnik. Oswald Putze was also among these Germans.

I can't find any of the group that distinguished himself in any way. Yet the question asks for a 'lone' German who played a 'key' part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
Kurdt said:
A rocket and a missile are essentially the same thing.

Oh, in that case I'd place my bet at that Helmut Groettrup type. I found another article, that named him as "the soviets biggest catch", but then I quickly lost the link again.
 
  • #36
George Jones said:
:confused:

If you have 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, don't you have 12 by the process of elimination?

12 was probably the easiest question on the quiz, because I am familiar with the guy's situation. He's moving from the U.S. to Canada, in part, because of the athletics programmes at U.S. universities.
I suppose I could be in prison for a week before I noticed the walls around me. My eyes passed over that list of answers again and again and I never noticed it.
12

Carl Wieman

Source:
Process of elimination. I can't find a source for this.
 
  • #37
Here's more on Herr Groettrup. Not 'lone'. I wonder if they mean von Braun himself. He didn't work directly for the Soviets, but his influence was key.

Encyclopedia Astronautica said:
In the Soviet Union, Early Russian Ballistic Missiles were developed using the skills of a captive German rocket team headed by von Braun's assistant, Helmut Groettrup.
http://www.astronautix.com/articles/spulus50.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
Here's a site that supports Groettrup.
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/r7.htm"
Encyclopedia Astronautica said:
Groettrup G-4 IRBM evaluated against Korolev's R-3. R-3 project reformulated Nation: USSR. Program: Navaho. The NTS (Scientific-Technical Soviet) of NII-88 met in plenary session and subjected Korolev's proposal to withering criticism. The G-4 was found to be superior. After heated discussion, the Soviet approved further development of technology for the R-3, but not the missile itself. The decisions were: an R-3A technology demonstrator would be built and flown under Project N-1 (probably to prove G-4 concepts). Under Project N-2 both the RD-110 and D-2 engines would proceed into development test in order to prove Lox/Kerosene propellant technology. Packet rocket and lightweight structure research for use in an ICBM would continue under project N-3 / T-1. Winged intercontinental cruise missile studies would continue under project N-3 / T-2. Neither the G-4 or R-3 ended up in production, but the design concepts of the G-4 led directly to Korolev's R-7 ICBM (essentially a cluster of G-4's or R-3A's) and the N1 superbooster. Work on the G-4 continued through 1952.
Note the embolded words. It was the R-7 that lifted Sputnik.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
yep, good point.
I found http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/31258" article on physicsworld, which is probably the article they are referring to.
Both of the guys are mentioned.

The only scientist who had elected to stay was Helmut Gröttrup, yet that single German engineer would turn out to be more than sufficient to revolutionize Soviet missile technology...

I still think it's Groettrup, although that "lone" throws me a bit off.

Maybe submit two versions of answers.. or would that be cheating.
:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
physarrista said:
yep, good point.
I found http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/31258" article on physicsworld, which is probably the article they are referring to.
Both of the guys are mentioned.



I still think it's Groettrup, although that "lone" throws me a bit off.

Maybe submit two versions of answers.. or would that be cheating.
:smile:
The url you link to is physicsworld itself. That suits me. Let's go with Groettrup and submit. I don't have time as I am leaving just now for a week long vacation. All the answers are in this thread, and it only remains for someone to collect them and send them in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Back
Top