Hilsch Tube: Separating Isotopes & Refining U235?

  • Thread starter Thread starter selfAdjoint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tube
AI Thread Summary
The Hilsch tube, a T-shaped device that separates gas molecules based on speed using centrifugal force, is rarely discussed today despite its intriguing properties. It was originally posed as a challenge to thermodynamics, akin to Maxwell's demon, but has since been explained. The potential application of the Hilsch tube for isotope separation, particularly for refining U235 from natural uranium, raises questions about its efficiency compared to traditional centrifuges, which are costly and sensitive. Some users reference South African attempts to use vortex tubes for this purpose, suggesting there may be more effective methods available with advanced technology. The discussion highlights interest in exploring the Hilsch tube's capabilities, especially in scenarios where conventional technology is not accessible.
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
6,843
Reaction score
11
The Hilsch tube is not often mentioned anymore. It is a T-shaped arrangement of three tubes. A gas is led in through the stem of the T. Vanes inside use centrifugal force to direct the faster moving molecules to one side, where the exit tube is bigger, and the slower ones to the thinner tube on the other side. In practice you can easily feel the difference in temperature of the two outputs.

Originally the Hilsch tube was presented as a challenge to thermodynamics, like Maxwell's demon. It has been successfully explained, although I don't now remember what the explanation was.

My question is this: Could the Hilsch tube be used to separate isotopes of the same element? Not to put too fine a point on it, could it be used to refine U235 from natural Uranium? Could anyone figure out how it would compare to other methods of doing this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Centrifuges are used to enrich Uranium, that is increase the U235 fraction, so that it can be used more efficiently in reactors, or even bombs.
 
Yes thanks, mathman. I new that. But apparently centrifuges for uranium separation are sensitive and costly because of their high speed. The Hilsch tube has no moving parts (aside from pumps).
 
Yes, it works.

http://www.metalworking-forum.com/metalworking/hilsch_vortex_tubes_454906.html

Somebody on this thread says the south africans did it. He says there are cheaper and more effective ways when better technology is available.

I don't know if he's right that it doesn't work very well, but the south african reference at least gives a place to look.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reference. I'm glad that someone tried the idea of using vortex tubes for separation! As for the "if technology is available", I was thinking of cases where technology wasn't available.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...

Similar threads

Back
Top