Hints for Proving n^5 = n (mod 10)

  • Thread starter Thread starter lil_luc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prove that n^5 ≡ n (mod 10) for any positive integer n, it is essential to demonstrate that n^5 - n is divisible by both 2 and 5. The evenness of n^5 - n follows from the factors n and n + 1, ensuring at least one is even. For divisibility by 5, mathematical induction can be employed to show that n^5 - n is indeed divisible by 5 for all positive integers n. Additionally, applying the Euler-Fermat theorem indicates that n^4 ≡ 1 (mod 10) for n coprime with 10, which supports the proof. This establishes that n^5 and n share the same units digit in their base 10 representations.
lil_luc
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can anyone give me hints to how to prove this??

Prove that for any positive integer n, n^5 and n have the same units digit in their base 10
representations; that is, prove that n^5 = n (mod 10).

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What does the Euler-Fermat theorem tells you, when applied to a congruence mod 10?
 
I'm sorry, I'm still a bit lost. Can you please explain what the Euler-Fermat theorem is and how I can apply that to this problem?

Thanks
 
See the following link:

http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/EulerFermatTheorem.html"

And notice that you only have to prove that:

n^{4}\equiv 1 \left(mod 10\right)

For n coprime with 10.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lil_luc said:
Can anyone give me hints to how to prove this??

Prove that for any positive integer n, n^5 and n have the same units digit in their base 10
representations; that is, prove that n^5 = n (mod 10).

Thanks!
This is equivalent to proving that n5 - n \equiv 0 (mod 10)

You can show this by proving that n5 - n is even, and is divisible by 5.
The first part is easy, since two of the factors of n5 - n are n and n + 1, one of which has to be even for any value of n.
The second part, showing that n5 - n is divisible by 5 can be done by math induction, and isn't too tricky.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top