History of Black Holes: Formation and Timing After the Big Bang

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilKravitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
The formation of black holes is believed to have begun about a million years after the Big Bang with the emergence of "population III" stars, which were significantly larger and likely collapsed into black holes shortly after their formation. These early black holes may have evolved into the supermassive black holes found at the centers of galaxies today. In the universe's first moments, micro-black holes could have formed due to high energy densities, but they would have quickly evaporated. The early universe's smoothness and the dominance of fundamental particles limited the formation of larger black holes during that time. Understanding the physics behind these processes remains an active area of research in cosmology.
PhilKravitz
When were the first black holes formed? How long after the big bang until black holes could form?
 
Space news on Phys.org
That's an excellent question, and one that's being actively studied. Thus there isn't an exact, known answer.

It is generally believed that the first stars ("population III" stars) formed about a million years after the big bang, these stars would have been much much larger than stars now, and most likely would have collapsed directly to early black-holes within a few million years after their formation (such large stars don't survive very long).
It is possible that these early, high-mass, black-holes grew gradually and became what are now the super-massive black holes at the center of galaxies.

It is also possible that in the first seconds of the universe, micro-black-holes were formed, but they would have disappeared soon afterwords.
 
zhermes said:
It is also possible that in the first seconds of the universe, micro-black-holes were formed, but they would have disappeared soon afterwords.

Why would black holes formed in the first few seconds be micro in mass? Would any be macro in mass? What is the physics that makes early black holes only micro?
 
PhilKravitz said:
Why would black holes formed in the first few seconds be micro in mass? Would any be macro in mass? What is the physics that makes early black holes only micro?
Remember that you start out with only fundamental particles, then protons, neutrons and electrons... and basics you're left with only those for a hundred million years (until the first stars are formed). Still, in the first small fractions of seconds, the energy of these particles were large enough that they could collide with each other---creating energy densities high enough to form a micro-black hole (with total mass roughly on the order of a proton or so).
 
Is it the amount of inhomogeneity that matters or the size of common particles? Even today the basic particle is a hydrogen atom with size 2E-10 meters. At 1E-6 seconds after the big bang neutrons and protons formed with size 1E-15 meters.

Why was the early universe so smooth that black holes could not form? I am not doubting that it was only wonder what was the physics behind it being so.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top