History of Strenght of Materials by Timoshenko

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the book "History of Strength of Materials" by Timoshenko, exploring its significance in the field of mechanical engineering (ME) and the broader context of materials science. Participants share their experiences with Timoshenko's work and other related texts, reflecting on their educational journeys and preferences in mechanics literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses enthusiasm for Timoshenko's book and its relevance to their studies in mechanical engineering, considering a future in materials science.
  • Another participant mentions a desire to read Timoshenko's works on mechanics but has not yet done so.
  • A different participant shares their experience of graduating without reading Timoshenko but later finding his work summarized effectively in Roark's book, which they describe as a comprehensive resource for stress analysis.
  • Some participants advocate for reading Timoshenko, referring to it as the "ME's bible," while also suggesting other authors like Higdon and Roark as valuable resources.
  • A humorous exchange occurs regarding the authorship of mechanics textbooks, with one participant jokingly attributing the work to "Tim O'Shenko," prompting laughter from others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of Timoshenko's work and its importance in mechanical engineering literature, though there are varying opinions on the necessity of reading his texts compared to others. The humorous remarks indicate a light-hearted disagreement about authorship but do not detract from the overall appreciation for the subject matter.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the summarization of Timoshenko's work in other texts, indicating a potential limitation in direct engagement with his original material. The discussion reflects personal experiences and preferences rather than a consensus on the superiority of one text over another.

Who May Find This Useful

Mechanical engineering students, educators, and professionals interested in the history and analysis of materials and mechanics may find this discussion relevant.

Cyrus
Messages
3,246
Reaction score
17
"History of Strenght of Materials" by Timoshenko

I just bought "History of Strenght of Materials" by Timoshenko = = GOD. Anyone else read it? As an ME, I want to read all the books on the history of ME, so that I know as much about my profession as possible. I really am starting to like materials. I might want to consider it if I ever get to grad school, but I am not too sure yet.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have always wanted to get his stuff on mechanics. I have just never gotten around to it.
 
Hi Cyrus'. I graduated as an ME without ever reading Timoshenko but heard a lot of very favorable things about him after that. I began using some of his stuff to analyze plates under pressure loads but soon found that all his work, as well as many others, was summerized quite well by Roark. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/007072542X/?tag=pfamazon01-20is updated regularly and has become the bible for stress analysis. Although it is a bit of a cookbook, it provides a tremendous amount of information about stress analysis in one very convenient book. If you're interested in materials and stress analysis, you'll soon become familiar with it I'm sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You guys should read Timoshenko, it is the ME's bible. Or, you should read Higdon, Ohlsen, stiles, weese, riley, also gods. Their book is one of the best.
 
Ahhh, the Irish always were the best at writing mechanics textbooks!


Couldn't have passed my ME degree without the help of Tim O'Shenko, he's a star!
 
hahahah :smile: i hope you are kidding brewnog
 
Cyclovenom said:
hahahah :smile: i hope you are kidding brewnog


Me? Kid?!

We tried that one on a Professor of Solids, he didn't see the funny side for some reason.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
856
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K