History of Uniform Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the historical development of the theory of Uniform Circular Motion, with a particular focus on Newton's contribution, including his coining of the term "centripetal." Participants express difficulty in finding comprehensive historical resources beyond basic information on pendulums. A request for additional names or links to articles is made to aid in writing a paper. Some resources are shared, but the search for more detailed historical context continues. Overall, the conversation highlights a gap in accessible information regarding the history of Uniform Circular Motion.
MohammadG
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Anyone know how the theory of Uniform Circular Motion was discovered?

I know Newton invented the word "centripetus", Latin for Centripetal but that's about it.

I can find history on the pendulum but nothing for uniform circular motion.

Could you give me some names? Or links to some articles online.

Would really help me with the paper I'm writing.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hassan2 said:
You can find some information in this link: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node151.html

That helped a bit but I'm looking for more history. I'm assuming Newton had something to with it as he invented the word centripetal. I can't find anything online though.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top