Hodge duality and differential forms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Hodge duality and differential forms in the context of a Lorentzian manifold, specifically Minkowski space. The equation $$A=d[(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)(dt+\lambda)]$$ leads to the condition $$d\star A=0$$, resulting in the Hodge-Laplacian equation $$\nabla^2[(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)(dt+\lambda)]=0$$. Participants clarify that each term in the derived equation must equal zero, leading to the conclusion that $$\nabla^2 (\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)=0$$ is valid under the assumption that $$\nabla^2$$ denotes the Hodge-Laplace operator, despite potential notational confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and their operations.
  • Familiarity with Hodge duality and the Hodge star operator.
  • Knowledge of the Laplace-Beltrami operator and its application in differential geometry.
  • Basic concepts of Lorentzian manifolds and Minkowski space.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Hodge star operator in differential geometry.
  • Learn about the Laplace-Beltrami operator and its applications in physics.
  • Explore the implications of Hodge duality in various geometrical contexts.
  • Investigate the use of differential forms in the formulation of physical theories, particularly in general relativity.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry who are interested in the applications of Hodge duality and differential forms in theoretical physics, particularly in the context of spacetime and manifold theory.

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
If we have,$$A=d[(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)(dt+\lambda)]$$
where $$\alpha$$ is a complex function and $$\lambda$$ is a 1-form. t here represents the time coordinate.

If we want to calculate $$d\star A=0$$ where $$\star$$ is hodge star, we get if I did my calculations correctly $$\nabla^2[(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)(dt+\lambda)]=0$$

From the product rule, we get $$(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)\nabla^2(dt+\lambda)+ (dt+\lambda)\nabla^2 (\bar{\alpha}-\alpha) +2 \nabla^2(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)\nabla^2(dt+\lambda)=0$$
Does it mean here that each term must equal zero and thus since $$(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)$$ can not be zero in the first term so $$\nabla^2(dt+\lambda)=0$$ thus killing with it the third term in the equation and only leaving the second term?
That is simplifying the above equation, we get, $$(dt+\lambda)\nabla^2 (\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)=0$$ thus leaving us with $$\nabla^2 (\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)=0$$

Can this step be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you're working on a Lorentzian manifold, Minkowski space?
What is ##\nabla^2##, the Hodge-Laplacian?

If you're doing physics, why choose a particular "time coordinate"?
 
$$\nabla^2$$ is the normal laplacian of (x,y,z). t is chosen like this such that dt is a 1 form.
 
Right, so you're working in a Newtonian spacetime. Maybe using the fact that
$$\Delta = \left( d + d^* \right)^2 = d d^* + d^* d $$
with ##d^*## being the codifferential will help. Btw, if you're doing Cartan calculus ##\nabla^2## is a bad notation for the Hodge-Laplace / Laplace-Beltrami operator, because it suggests that you're applying the connection twice.
 
So yes, considering that I used this notation istead of $\nabla^2$ is my final answer correct or at least is the procedure correct that I considered all terms must be set equal to zero?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K