Holographic universe and werewolves/shapeshifters.possible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of shapeshifting, such as becoming werewolves, within the framework of a holographic universe. Participants express skepticism about the feasibility of such transformations, emphasizing the need for a clear definition of the holographic universe concept. Some suggest that while science tends to disprove supernatural claims, certain belief systems might entertain the idea of shapeshifting. The conversation also touches on the nature of space-time and proposes that it could be viewed as a form of memory rather than just a hologram. Overall, the thread highlights the intersection of science, belief, and speculative ideas regarding transformation in a holographic context.
jimmy1200
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
now i don't know the specifics of the theory. i obvioulsy need to read up on it again or get a book, but i did a little googling earlier to try and link the two,but came up a little short. still got some reading to go, but in the mean time.
is it possible in a holographic universe, for people to shapeshift. become werewolves or bears or flys. can someone take the time to break it down for me. I am sure there is a way. there is always some back door.

thanks. no offense, but if you barely know anything about the theory or how you could apply it to this or specifically not. please don't post some stupid post followed by a smiley face, giving me no information for or against the topic.
 
Space news on Phys.org
jimmy1200 said:
now i don't know the specifics of the theory. i obvioulsy need to read up on it again or get a book, but i did a little googling earlier to try and link the two,but came up a little short. still got some reading to go...

Jimmy,

I think you will find it very hard to get hold of anyone who believes in shapeshifting or werewolves these days (even on the internet). Are you thinking of ideas coming from any particular religion or belief system (eg. UFOs/Aliens)?

jimmy1200 said:
is it possible in a holographic universe, for people to shapeshift. become werewolves or bears or flys.

I think you need to define "holographic universe". My guess is that in any universe, science can only shed increasing doubt on such ideas rather than provide a proof that they are impossible. Of course, some known animals change form, but usually this takes a long time (eg. butterfly-->catapilla). If aliens exist out there, perhaps it isn't quite so daft. Or if certain religions turned out to be correct, it would follow that there is a supernatural etc.

jimmy1200 said:
thanks. no offense, but if you barely know anything about the theory or how you could apply it to this or specifically not. please don't post some stupid post followed by a smiley face...

I'm trying really hard to control myself... (No smiley). :biggrin: oops.
 
Ghost Universe

What is the make-up of space-time? :bugeye:
Is it a substance unlike energy, that can not be
changed, but, takes on the essence of energy?
A mirror soul of spirit that retains the character
of the changing movement of energy.
I must call this substance --- memory.

I prefer the term memory over hologram.
Or -- memory/hologram -- that moves
in time to give us a ghost which are alive.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top